CVE-2008-1813
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 have unknown impact and remote unauthenticated or authenticated attack vectors related to (1) SYS.DBMS_AQ in the Advanced Queuing component, aka DB01; (2) Core RDBMS, aka DB03; (3) SDO_GEOM in Oracle Spatial, aka DB06; (4) Export, aka DB12; and (5) DBMS_STATS in Query Optimizer, aka DB13. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the Oracle CPU. Oracle has not commented on reliable researcher claims that DB06 is SQL injection, and DB13 occurs when the OUTLN account is reset to use a hard-coded password.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple remote vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.x and 10.x affect five components: Advanced Queuing (DBMS_AQ), Core RDBMS, Oracle Spatial (SDO_GEOM - claimed SQL injection), Export, and Query Optimizer (DBMS_STATS). Some vectors allow unauthenticated exploitation while DB13 requires the OUTLN account to be reset to a hard-coded password. The exact impact is unspecified by Oracle.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0.1.5= 9.2.0.8= 9.2.0.8dv= 9.0.1.5= 10.1.0.5= 10.2.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Oracle Database versionConnect to the database as a privileged user (e.g., SYS) and execute: SELECT VERSION FROM V$INSTANCE; or check the oratab / etc/oratab file for the installed Oracle home version.Affected if The version matches 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8dv, 10.1.0.5, or 10.2.0.3
-
Check if Advanced Queuing (DBMS_AQ) is accessibleQuery SELECT owner, object_name FROM dba_objects WHERE object_name = 'DBMS_AQ' AND object_type = 'PACKAGE'; to verify the package exists and is accessible to potentially exploitable users.Affected if DBMS_AQ package exists and is granted to public or non-privileged users in a vulnerable version environment
-
Check if Oracle Spatial (SDO_GEOM) is installed and exposedQuery SELECT owner, object_name FROM dba_objects WHERE object_name = 'SDO_GEOM' AND object_type = 'PACKAGE'; Also verify which users have execute privileges on this package.Affected if SDO_GEOM package exists and is accessible to public or application users in a vulnerable version environment
-
Check if DBMS_STATS is accessible to potentially exploitable usersQuery SELECT grantee, privilege FROM dba_tab_privs WHERE table_name = 'DBMS_STATS'; to identify who can execute this package.Affected if DBMS_STATS is granted to public or low-privileged users in a vulnerable version environment
-
Verify OUTLN account statusQuery SELECT username, account_status, password_versions FROM dba_users WHERE username = 'OUTLN'; The DB13 flaw requires the OUTLN account with hard-coded password.Affected if OUTLN account exists and is unlocked/accessible in a vulnerable version environment
If the installed Oracle version matches 9.0.1.5, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8dv, 10.1.0.5, or 10.2.0.3 AND any of the affected components (DBMS_AQ, SDO_GEOM, DBMS_STATS, or OUTLN account) are accessible to potentially unauthorized users, the environment is likely affected by CVE-2008-1813.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for April 2008 or later to address these vulnerabilities; for DB13 specifically, ensure the OUTLN account password is properly managed and not reset to default credentials.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-1813 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.red-database-security.com
- www.red-database-security.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-1813 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data