CVE-2008-1997
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the ADMIN_SP_C2 procedure in IBM DB2 8 before FP16, 9.1 before FP4a, and 9.5 before FP1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors. NOTE: the ADMIN_SP_C issue is already covered by CVE-2008-0699.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the ADMIN_SP_C2 stored procedure in IBM DB2 versions 8 before FP16, 9.1 before FP4a, and 9.5 before FP1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. This is a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting the DB2 administrative functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.1= 9.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed DB2 version and fix pack levelConnect to the DB2 database and run: SELECT * FROM SYSIBMADM.SNAPDB or query the DB2REGISTRY table to retrieve the version and fix pack information. Alternatively, use the 'db2level' command from the DB2 command line.Affected if The installed version is DB2 8.x with fix pack earlier than 16, DB2 9.1 with fix pack earlier than 4a, or DB2 9.5 with fix pack earlier than 1.
-
Verify the ADMIN_SP_C2 stored procedure existsQuery the SYSCAT.PROCEDURES catalog view: SELECT PROCNAME, SCHEMA FROM SYSCAT.PROCEDURES WHERE PROCNAME = 'ADMIN_SP_C2'. This procedure is part of the DB2 administrative routines.Affected if The ADMIN_SP_C2 stored procedure is found in the database, indicating the vulnerable component is present.
-
Check which users have execute permission on ADMIN_SP_C2Query SYSCAT.PROCEDUTH view: SELECT GRANTOR, GRANTEE, PROCNAME, SCHEMA FROM SYSCAT.PROCEDUTH WHERE PROCNAME = 'ADMIN_SP_C2'. This shows which authenticated users or groups can invoke the procedure.Affected if Any non-administrative or low-privilege authenticated user has execute permissions on ADMIN_SP_C2.
-
Determine if remote connections are enabledExamine the DB2 configuration using: GET DBM CFG or query DBMCFG for parameters like 'DISCOVER_INST' and 'SERVICE_NAME'. Also check the DB2 server listening ports and authentication settings.Affected if Remote TCP/IP connections are allowed and authentication is configured for remote users.
You are affected if you are running DB2 version 8 before FP16, 9.1 before FP4a, or 9.5 before FP1, and the ADMIN_SP_C2 stored procedure is accessible to authenticated remote users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM DB2 to version 8 FP16 or later, 9.1 FP4a or later, or 9.5 FP1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to DB2 and limit which authenticated users can execute stored procedures.
IBM DB2 v8 FP16+, v9.1 FP4a+, or v9.5 FP1+
- 1. Identify current IBM DB2 version and fix pack level by running: 'db2level' command or checking DB2 diagnostic logs
- 2. For DB2 version 8: Upgrade to Fix Pack 16 or later
- 3. For DB2 version 9.1: Upgrade to Fix Pack 4a (FP4a) or later
- 4. For DB2 version 9.5: Upgrade to Fix Pack 1 (FP1) or later
- 5. Download the appropriate fix pack from IBM Fix Central (https://www-945.ibm.com/support/fixcentral/)
- 6. Stop all DB2 instances and dependencies before applying the fix pack
- 7. Apply the fix pack using IBM's installation instructions for your platform
- 8. Restart DB2 instances after the fix pack installation completes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-1997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-1997 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data