CVE-2008-2152
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger overflow in the rtl_allocateMemory function in sal/rtl/source/alloc_global.c in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.0 through 2.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow in OpenOffice.org's rtl_allocateMemory function allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted files that trigger a heap-based buffer overflow. The vulnerability exists in the memory allocation routine within sal/rtl/source/alloc_global.c, where insufficient integer overflow validation permits oversized buffer allocations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0= 2.1= 2.2= 2.3= 2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed OpenOffice.org versionOn Windows, open Help > About OpenOffice.org or run: soffice -version in terminal. On Linux, run: openoffice.org --version or soffice --versionAffected if Version is 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, or 2.4 (any of these versions is affected)
-
Locate the vulnerable rtl_allocateMemory componentSearch for the file alloc_global.c in the sal/rtl/source/ directory within the OpenOffice.org installation path. Common paths: C:\Program Files\OpenOffice.org\program\ on Windows, /usr/lib/openoffice/ on LinuxAffected if File exists at sal/rtl/source/alloc_global.c in the OpenOffice.org installation directory
-
Verify the rtl_allocateMemory function is presentUse a binary analysis tool or strings utility to search for 'rtl_allocateMemory' in the relevant library files (e.g., sal.dll on Windows, sal.so on Linux)Affected if The rtl_allocateMemory symbol exists in the sal library binary, indicating the vulnerable allocation routine is present
-
Check for integer overflow safeguards in allocation codeIf source code is available, examine the rtl_allocateMemory function in sal/rtl/source/alloc_global.c for proper overflow validation before malloc callsAffected if The source code lacks proper integer overflow checks before heap buffer allocation in rtl_allocateMemory
You are affected if OpenOffice.org version 2.0 through 2.4 is installed and the vulnerable rtl_allocateMemory function in sal/rtl/source/alloc_global.c is present without integer overflow validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to OpenOffice.org version 2.4.1 or later, or apply the vendor-provided patch that adds proper integer overflow checks in the rtl_allocateMemory function to validate allocation sizes before heap allocation.
OpenOffice.org 2.4.1 or later (Apache OpenOffice)
- 1. Back up any important documents and settings from your current OpenOffice.org installation
- 2. Download OpenOffice.org version 2.4.1 or later from the official Apache OpenOffice archive (https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/)
- 3. Uninstall the current vulnerable version of OpenOffice.org (2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, or 2.4)
- 4. Install the downloaded OpenOffice.org 2.4.1 or newer version
- 5. Verify the installation by checking Help > About Apache OpenOffice to confirm the version
- 6. Reapply any user preferences or configurations as needed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-2152 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- labs.idefense.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- sunsolve.sun.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.openoffice.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-2152 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data