CVE-2008-2423
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Interchange before 5.6.0 and before 5.5.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted HTTP requests. NOTE: this might overlap CVE-2007-2635.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInterchange (an e-commerce web application) before versions 5.6.0 and 5.5.2 contains an unspecified vulnerability that allows remote attackers to cause denial of service via crafted HTTP requests. The vulnerability can be exploited remotely without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.8.0= 4.8.1= 4.8.2= 4.8.3= 4.8.4= 4.8.5= 4.8.6= 4.8.7= 4.8.8= 4.8.9= 4.9.3= 4.9.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Interchange installationCheck for the interchange binary or control script. Common paths include /usr/bin/interchange, /usr/local/bin/interchange, or /opt/interchange/bin/interchange. On Linux, also run: rpm -qa | grep -i interchange or dpkg -l | grep -i interchangeAffected if Interchange is not found on the system (not vulnerable because not installed)
-
Determine installed Interchange versionRun the interchange binary with version flag, such as: interchange --version or interchangectl --version. If installed via package manager, use: rpm -q interchange or dpkg -s interchangeAffected if The version returned is 4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.8.2, 4.8.3, 4.8.4, 4.8.5, 4.8.6, 4.8.7, 4.8.8, 4.8.9, 4.9.3, or 4.9.4
-
Verify HTTP access is enabledCheck if Interchange is configured to accept HTTP connections. Look for HTTP server configuration in interchange.cfg or catalog.cfg files. Check if the server is bound to a network interface (default port 7786 for demo, or 80/443 for production). Commands: netstat -tlnp | grep -E '(7786|80|443)' or ss -tlnp | grep -E '(7786|80|443)'Affected if Interchange is listening on a network port and accessible via HTTP (required for remote exploitation)
-
Check for unauthenticated HTTP endpointsReview the Interchange catalog configuration for any publicly accessible endpoints. Examine catalog.cfg for [catalog] sections that expose pages without authentication. Inspect the www/ directory for HTML or/or pages that are served without requiring loginAffected if Unauthenticated HTTP endpoints are exposed to the network (exploitation does not require authentication)
If Interchange is installed and running with an affected version (4.8.x or 4.9.3-4.9.4) while listening on an HTTP port accessible over the network, the environment is vulnerable to remote denial of service via crafted HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Interchange to version 5.6.0 or 5.5.2 or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate upgrading is not possible, consider restricting HTTP access to the application via network-level controls or a WAF.
Interchange 5.6.0 or later (or 5.5.2 or later)
- 1. Identify the current Interchange version by checking the version file or running 'interchange --version'
- 2. Back up the entire Interchange installation directory and database
- 3. Download the fixed Interchange version 5.6.0 or later (or 5.5.2 or later) from the official ICdevgroup repository
- 4. Stop the Interchange server daemon
- 5. Install the new version following the standard Interchange upgrade procedure
- 6. Start the Interchange server and verify it is running correctly
- 7. Test that the web application functions normally after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-2423 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-2423 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data