CVE-2008-2952
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedliblber/io.c in OpenLDAP 2.2.4 to 2.4.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (program termination) via crafted ASN.1 BER datagrams that trigger an assertion error.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpenLDAP's liblber library (io.c) fails to properly handle malformed ASN.1 BER (Basic Encoding Rules) datagrams. When receiving specially crafted packets, an assertion error is triggered in the BER decoding routine, causing the OpenLDAP daemon to terminate abruptly.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.2.4= 2.2.5= 2.2.6= 2.2.7= 2.2.8= 2.2.9= 2.3.4= 2.3.5= 2.3.6= 2.3.7= 2.3.8= 2.3.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify OpenLDAP is installedRun 'ldapd -V' or 'slapd -V' to check for OpenLDAP server binaries, or check package manager output (rpm -q openldap, dpkg -l openldap, etc.)Affected if No OpenLDAP installation found means not affected
-
Identify installed OpenLDAP versionExecute 'slapd -V' or 'ldapd -V' and note the full version string returnedAffected if Version number matches any of: 2.2.4, 2.2.5, 2.2.6, 2.2.7, 2.2.8, 2.2.9, 2.3.4, 2.3.5, 2.3.6, 2.3.7, 2.3.8, or 2.3.9
-
Confirm LDAP service is running and network-accessibleCheck service status (systemctl status slapd or ps aux | grep slapd) and verify listening port (netstat -anp | grep 389 or ss -tlnp | grep 389)Affected if LDAP daemon (slapd) is running and bound to a network interface accessible to untrusted sources
-
Assess network exposure of LDAP portReview firewall rules (iptables -L or nft list ruleset) and network configuration to determine if port 389/636 is exposed to untrusted networksAffected if LDAP service port is reachable from untrusted network segments - exploitation requires receiving malformed BER packets
You are affected if OpenLDAP version is 2.2.4-2.2.9 or 2.3.4-2.3.9 AND the LDAP daemon is running and network-accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade OpenLDAP to a version newer than 2.4.10 where the BER parsing has been corrected. Additionally, consider network-level filtering to limit exposure of LDAP services to untrusted sources.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-2952 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- lists.apple.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- security.gentoo.org
- wiki.rpath.com
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.openldap.org
- www.openldap.org
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- issues.rpath.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-2952 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data