CVE-2008-3034
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in RSS-aggregator 1.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) IdFlux parameter to admin/fonctions/supprimer_flux.php and the (2) IdTag parameter to admin/fonctions/supprimer_tag.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTwo SQL injection vulnerabilities in RSS-aggregator 1.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the IdFlux parameter in admin/fonctions/supprimer_flux.php and the IdTag parameter in admin/fonctions/supprimer_tag.php. The vulnerabilities stem from unsanitized user input being directly used in SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm RSS Aggregator 1.0 installationLocate the application directory and check for version identification files (such as a README, version.php, or meta files) that indicate the installed version is 1.0Affected if The installed version is Rss Aggregator 1.0 exactly
-
Identify vulnerable file presenceSearch the web root for the files admin/fonctions/supprimer_flux.php and admin/fonctions/supprimer_tag.phpAffected if Both or either of these files exist in the application directory
-
Check for unsanitized IdFlux usageInspect admin/fonctions/supprimer_flux.php and locate the line where the IdFlux parameter is used in an SQL query without prepared statements or escaping functionsAffected if The IdFlux parameter is directly concatenated into a SQL query without sanitization
-
Check for unsanitized IdTag usageInspect admin/fonctions/supprimer_tag.php and locate the line where the IdTag parameter is used in an SQL query without prepared statements or escaping functionsAffected if The IdTag parameter is directly concatenated into a SQL query without sanitization
If RSS Aggregator version 1.0 is installed and the vulnerable files contain direct SQL parameter insertion, the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all database operations in the affected files, and perform input validation on the IdFlux and IdTag parameters before using them in SQL queries.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-3034 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-3034 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data