WiresharkApplication

CVE-2008-3140

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-07-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The syslog dissector in Wireshark (formerly Ethereal) 1.0.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via unknown vectors, possibly related to an "incomplete SS7 MSU syslog encapsulated packet."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Wireshark 1.0.0 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability in its syslog dissector. The vulnerability can be triggered by specially crafted (possibly malformed) SS7 MSU syslog encapsulated packets, causing the application to crash. This is a vulnerability in packet parsing logic that fails to handle incomplete or malformed input gracefully.

MitigationUpdate Wireshark to a version newer than 1.0.0 that contains the fix for this vulnerability. If updates are not possible, consider restricting access to packet capture sources or implementing network filtering to block suspicious syslog traffic before it reaches Wireshark.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WiresharkApplication
Affected:= 1.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Wireshark version
    Run 'wireshark -v' or 'tshark -v' from command line, or check Help > About in GUI
    Affected if Version reported is exactly 1.0.0
  2. Verify syslog dissector is available
    Check if packet-syslog.c or packet-syslog.h exists in the Wireshark installation directory, or look for 'Syslog' in Analyze > Enabled Protocols
    Affected if Syslog protocol/dissector is present and enabled in the protocol list
  3. Confirm syslog dissector is enabled
    In Wireshark GUI, go to Analyze > Enabled Protocols and verify 'SYSLOG' or 'Syslog' is checked, or use 'tshark -G protocols' output to search for syslog
    Affected if Syslog protocol is enabled for dissection
  4. Check for recent syslog-based capture activity
    Review any recent packet capture files (.pcap) that contain syslog traffic, or check if Wireshark is actively capturing on interfaces that receive syslog traffic
    Affected if Wireshark has parsed or is expected to parse syslog traffic from network sources
  5. Identify SS7 MSU syslog encapsulation exposure
    Check if the environment contains or monitors SS7-based telecom signaling traffic that may be encapsulated in syslog format, or review any pcap files for syslog packets containing SS7 data
    Affected if Environment processes or may process SS7 MSU traffic carried over syslog

User is affected if Wireshark version is exactly 1.0.0 and the syslog dissector is enabled to parse incoming syslog traffic that could contain malicious SS7 MSU payloads.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Wireshark to a version newer than 1.0.0 that contains the fix for this vulnerability. If updates are not possible, consider restricting access to packet capture sources or implementing network filtering to block suspicious syslog traffic before it reaches Wireshark.

Fix this in Wireshark Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-3140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-3140 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data