CVE-2008-3844
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCertain Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 4 and 5 packages for OpenSSH, as signed in August 2008 using a legitimate Red Hat GPG key, contain an externally introduced modification (Trojan Horse) that allows the package authors to have an unknown impact. NOTE: since the malicious packages were not distributed from any official Red Hat sources, the scope of this issue is restricted to users who may have obtained these packages through unofficial distribution points. As of 20080827, no unofficial distributions of this software are known.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceTrojaned OpenSSH packages for RHEL 4 and 5 were signed in August 2008 using legitimate Red Hat GPG keys, representing a supply chain compromise where attackers obtained or forged signing credentials to introduce unknown malicious modifications (likely a backdoor) into the SSH daemon packages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed OpenSSH package versionRun 'rpm -qa | grep openssh' on Red Hat-based systems to list installed OpenSSH packages and their versionsAffected if The installed version matches the compromised packages from August 2008 (versions released in that timeframe) or shows a version not available in official Red Hat channels
-
Verify package GPG signaturesRun 'rpm --checksig /path/to/openssh*.rpm' or for installed packages 'rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n' | xargs rpm --checksig' to verify signatures are valid and match Red Hat's official GPG keysAffected if Signatures fail verification, show unknown keys, or signatures cannot be validated against trusted Red Hat GPG keyrings
-
Compare against official Red Hat repositoriesRun 'yum check-update' or 'yum list openssh*' to compare installed packages against official repository versions, or manually download packages from access.redhat.com and compare checksumsAffected if Installed packages differ from repository versions or show versions/checksums not present in official RHN channels
-
Inspect package file integrityRun 'rpm -V openssh' to check for any modified files in the installed package, or use 'rpm -ql openssh' to list all package files and verify against known-good baselineAffected if Any files show as modified (verification fails) or unexpected files exist in the OpenSSH package directory
The system is affected if OpenSSH packages were installed during August 2008 from non-official sources or if package signatures, versions, or file integrity checks do not match official Red Hat repository data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUsers should verify their OpenSSH packages against official Red Hat repositories, confirm package signatures are valid and match official sources, and re-install OpenSSH from trusted official channels if any discrepancy is found.
- 1. Verify that all OpenSSH installations are obtained from official vendor repositories (e.g., official Red Hat/CentOS/Fedora repositories for RHEL-based systems)
- 2. For any systems that may have installed OpenSSH from unofficial or third-party sources between July-August 2008, perform a fresh OS installation from official media
- 3. Verify package signatures (rpm -K) on any SSH-related packages to ensure they are signed by the expected legitimate vendor GPG keys
- 4. If compromise is suspected, treat the system as potentially fully compromised and rebuild from trusted sources
- 5. Implement a policy of only installing software from official vendor repositories
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-3844 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-3844 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data