CVE-2008-4383
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in the Agranet-Emweb embedded management web server in Alcatel OmniSwitch OS7000, OS6600, OS6800, OS6850, and OS9000 Series devices with AoS 5.1 before 5.1.6.463.R02, 5.4 before 5.4.1.429.R01, 6.1.3 before 6.1.3.965.R01, 6.1.5 before 6.1.5.595.R01, and 6.3 before 6.3.1.966.R01 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long Session cookie.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Alcatel's Agranet-Emweb embedded web server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted long Session cookie. The vulnerability affects multiple OmniSwitch series (OS7000, OS6600, OS6800, OS6850, OS9000) running affected AoS versions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.1, < 5.1.6.463.r02>= 5.4, < 5.4.1.429.r01>= 6.1.3, < 6.1.3.965.r01>= 6.1.5, < 6.1.5.595.r01>= 6.3, < 6.3.1.966.r01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the OmniSwitch modelLog into the switch CLI and run 'show system' or 'show version' to confirm the device model (OS7000, OS6600, OS6800, OS6850, or OS9000)Affected if The device is not one of these OmniSwitch series models (not affected)
-
Determine the installed AoS versionRun 'show system' or 'show version' in the switch CLI to retrieve the AoS firmware version (for example, 5.4.0.456.R01)Affected if The version matches one of the affected ranges: >=5.1 but <5.1.6.463.r02, >=5.4 but <5.4.1.429.r01, >=6.1.3 but <6.1.3.965.r01, >=6.1.5 but <6.1.5.595.r01, or >=6.3 but <6.3.1.966.r01
-
Verify the Agranet-Emweb web server is enabledRun 'show web' or 'show web-server status' to check if the embedded web management interface is enabledAffected if The web server is enabled and running (required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
-
Check web interface accessibilityRun 'show ip http' or review the management VLAN configuration to determine if the web interface is accessible from network segments outside trusted administration networksAffected if The web interface is exposed to untrusted networks (increases exposure risk)
The environment is affected if the device is an OmniSwitch OS7000/OS6600/OS6800/OS6850/OS9000 running an AoS version within the affected ranges AND the Agranet-Emweb web server is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.6.463.r025.4.1.429.r016.1.3.965.r01
Apply vendor-supplied firmware patches (AoS 5.1.6.463.R02, 5.4.1.429.R01, 6.1.3.965.R01, 6.1.5.595.R01, or 6.3.1.966.R01 or later) to all affected devices. Consider restricting web management interface access to trusted networks until patching is complete.
Upgrade to AoS 5.1.6.463.R02, 5.4.1.429.R01, 6.1.3.965.R01, 6.1.5.595.R01, or 6.3.1.966.R01 (or later) depending on your product series
- 1. Identify the exact Alcatel OmniSwitch model (OS7000, OS6600, OS6800, OS6850, or OS9000) and current AoS firmware version via CLI (show version) or web interface
- 2. Access Alcatel support portal or official firmware download page to obtain the appropriate fixed firmware version for your model
- 3. For AoS 5.1.x: upgrade to version 5.1.6.463.R02 or later
- 4. For AoS 5.4.x: upgrade to version 5.4.1.429.R01 or later
- 5. For AoS 6.1.3.x: upgrade to version 6.1.3.965.R01 or later
- 6. For AoS 6.1.5.x: upgrade to version 6.1.5.595.R01 or later
- 7. For AoS 6.3.x: upgrade to version 6.3.1.966.R01 or later (if applicable)
- 8. Upload the firmware to the device via TFTP, FTP, or USB depending on device capabilities
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-4383 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-4383 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data