CmanApplication · Gentoo

CVE-2008-4580

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-10-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
fence_manual, as used in fence 2.02.00-r1 and possibly cman, allows local users to modify arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the fence_manual.fifo temporary file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

fence_manual in fence 2.02.00-r1 (and possibly cman) creates a temporary FIFO file (fence_manual.fifo) without proper safeguards against symlink attacks. A local attacker can create a symlink at the expected temp file location pointing to an arbitrary target file, causing fence_manual to overwrite or modify that file when it opens the FIFO.

MitigationModify the temporary file creation to use open() with O_EXCL flag or equivalent to fail if a file already exists at the target path, preventing symlink hijacking. Alternatively, use a secure temporary directory with restricted permissions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CmanApplication
Affected:= 2.02.00
FenceApplication
Affected:= 2.02.00

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if fence or cman package is installed
    Run `equery list fence` or `equery list cman` on Gentoo to list installed fence/cman packages, or use `rpm -qa | grep -i fence` on RPM-based systems
    Affected if fence or cman package version 2.02.00-r1 or 2.02.00 is installed
  2. Identify fence_manual binary location
    Run `which fence_manual` or `find /usr -name fence_manual -type f` to locate the fence_manual binary
    Affected if fence_manual binary exists on the system
  3. Determine the temporary directory used by fence_manual
    Review fence_manual source code or man page, or run `strace -f fence_manual --help 2>&1 | grep -i tmp` to observe temporary file creation behavior
    Affected if fence_manual creates FIFO files in a world-writable directory without O_EXCL protection
  4. Check for existing FIFO file or symlink at expected location
    Look for /var/lib/fence/fence_manual.fifo or check the directory used for temp files for any pre-existing FIFO files or symlinks
    Affected if A FIFO file or symlink named fence_manual.fifo already exists in the temp directory
  5. Check directory permissions where FIFO would be created
    Run `ls -ld` on the directory where fence_manual creates its temp files (e.g., /var/lib/fence or /tmp)
    Affected if The directory is world-writable and allows unprivileged users to create files/symlinks
  6. Verify if fence_manual has been run recently
    Check /var/log/messages, audit logs, or use `ls -la` on potential temp directories for recent fence_manual.fifo files
    Affected if fence_manual.fifo was recently created and the directory lacks proper access controls

A user is affected if fence_manual version 2.02.00 is installed and creates FIFO files in a directory where unprivileged local users can create symlinks (such as /tmp or unprotected /var/lib/fence), allowing file overwrite via symlink attack.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Modify the temporary file creation to use open() with O_EXCL flag or equivalent to fail if a file already exists at the target path, preventing symlink hijacking. Alternatively, use a secure temporary directory with restricted permissions.

Fix this in Cman Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-4580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-4580 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data