Websphere Application ServerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2008-4678

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-10-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The HTTP_Request_Parser method in the HTTP Transport component in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.0.2 before 6.0.2.31 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (controller 0C4 abend and application hang) via a long HTTP Host header, related to "storage overlay" on the stack and a "parse failure."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The HTTP_Request_Parser method in IBM WebSphere Application Server 6.0.2 HTTP Transport component fails to properly validate the length of incoming HTTP Host headers. The excessive header length causes a storage overlay on the stack, leading to a controller 0C4 abend (abnormal termination) and application hang, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationApply IBM WebSphere Application Server fix pack 6.0.2.31 or later, which contains the proper bounds checking for HTTP Host header parsing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Websphere Application ServerApplication
Affected:= 6.0.2= 6.0.2.1= 6.0.2.2= 6.0.2.3= 6.0.2.4= 6.0.2.5= 6.0.2.6= 6.0.2.9= 6.0.2.11= 6.0.2.13= 6.0.2.15= 6.0.2.17

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine WebSphere Application Server version
    Run the versionInfo command from the bin directory of the WAS installation, or access the About WebSphere Application Server page in the admin console under Troubleshooting > Version Info
    Affected if The installed version matches 6.0.2.x where x is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15, or 17 (exact match to any of the listed affected versions)
  2. Verify HTTP Transport is in use
    Confirm the web container is running and accepting HTTP connections. Check the web container ports in the server configuration under Servers > Server Types > Web container transport chains
    Affected if HTTP transport is enabled and the server accepts HTTP requests on configured ports (this is the default configuration)
  3. Review SystemOut.log for异常
    Examine the WebSphere SystemOut.log file located in the profile directory under logs/server1/ for Java exceptions related to header parsing or memory corruption
    Affected if Exceptions mentioning header parsing failures, buffer overflow, or stack corruption appear in the logs after processing HTTP requests with long Host headers
  4. Check for controller 0C4 abends
    Review native stderr logs and crash dump directories for abnormal termination events with reason code 0C4, which indicates a program check interrupt
    Affected if The server has experienced 0C4 abends (controller program check) that correlate with periods of heavy HTTP traffic or requests with unusually long Host headers

You are affected if you are running any of the exact WebSphere Application Server versions 6.0.2 through 6.0.2.17 (specific fix packs listed) and the HTTP Transport component is enabled, which is the default state.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM WebSphere Application Server fix pack 6.0.2.31 or later, which contains the proper bounds checking for HTTP Host header parsing.

Fix this in Websphere Application Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-4678 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-4678 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data