CVE-2008-4832
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedrc.sysinit in initscripts 8.12-8.21 and 8.56.15-0.1 on rPath allows local users to delete arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a directory under (1) /var/lock or (2) /var/run. NOTE: this issue exists because of a race condition in an incorrect fix for CVE-2008-3524. NOTE: exploitation may require an unusual scenario in which rc.sysinit is executed other than at boot time.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a symlink race condition vulnerability in the rc.sysinit startup script from the initscripts package (versions 8.12-8.21 and 8.56.15-0.1 on rPath). Local users can exploit insecure handling of /var/lock and /var/run directories to delete arbitrary files via symlink attacks. The flaw exists because the original fix for CVE-2008-3524 was incomplete, leaving a race condition window.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.12-8.21= 8.56.15-0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed initscripts package versionRun: rpm -qa | grep -i initscripts (for RPM-based) or dpkg -l | grep -i initscripts (for Debian-based). Also check /var/log/packages/initscripts if using rPath. Note the exact version number returned.Affected if The version falls within 8.12-8.21 or equals 8.56.15-0.1 (rPath-specific). Compare your version against these ranges.
-
Locate the rc.sysinit scriptFind the rc.sysinit file on the system. Typical paths include /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit or /etc/rc.sysinit. Verify the file exists and note its full path.Affected if The script exists and originates from a vulnerable initscripts package version.
-
Inspect the handling of /var/run and /var/lock in rc.sysinitOpen the rc.sysinit file and search for code that creates, sets permissions on, or writes to /var/run or /var/lock directories. Look for operations that may occur before setting secure permissions, particularly any mkdir or chmod commands with timing gaps.Affected if The script performs mkdir or chmod operations on these directories without atomic operations, leaving a race condition window between creation and permission setting.
-
Check current permissions on /var/run and /var/lockRun: ls -lad /var/run /var/lock. Examine the permissions, ownership, and sticky bit settings. Verify if permissions are 1777 (world-writable with sticky bit) or otherwise insecure.Affected if The directories have permissive permissions (such as 1777) or lack proper ownership/restrictions that would allow symlink attacks.
The system is affected if the installed initscripts package version matches 8.12-8.21 or 8.56.15-0.1 and the rc.sysinit script handles /var/run or /var/lock with a race condition window before applying secure permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the updated initscripts package patch that properly secures the /var/lock and /var/run directories against symlink attacks. Consider restricting permissions on these directories as an additional defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-4832 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-4832 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data