Ec CubeApplication

CVE-2008-4991

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-11-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in LOCKON CO.,LTD. EC-CUBE 2.3.0 and earlier, 1.4.7 and earlier, and 1.5.0-beta2 and earlier; and Community Edition 1.3.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in LOCKON CO.,LTD. EC-CUBE e-commerce platform versions 2.3.0 and earlier, 1.4.7 and earlier, 1.5.0-beta2 and earlier, and Community Edition 1.3.5 and earlier. Remote attackers can execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified parameters, likely due to unsanitized user input being directly used in SQL queries.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of EC-CUBE. If upgrading is not feasible, implement input validation and convert all database queries to use parameterized queries/prepared statements to prevent SQL injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ec CubeApplication
Affected:<= 1.3.5<= 1.4.7<= 1.5.0<= 2.3.0= 1.3.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify EC-CUBE installation
    Locate EC-CUBE files on the server. Common indicators include directories named 'eccube' or files containing 'EC-CUBE' branding strings in the web root.
    Affected if EC-CUBE files are found on the server
  2. Determine installed version
    Check for version files, README files, or configuration files that contain the EC-CUBE version number. Common locations include version.php, version.txt, or the data/class/SC_Version.php file.
    Affected if The installed version is 2.3.0 or earlier, 1.4.7 or earlier, 1.5.0-beta2 or earlier, Community Edition 1.3.5 or earlier, or specifically version 1.3.4
  3. Check web server exposure
    Verify whether the EC-CUBE application is accessible over the network by attempting to access the main URL or checking web server configuration for EC-CUBE routes.
    Affected if The application is accessible to network attackers and contains user input parameters
  4. Inspect database query implementation
    Examine the PHP source files in the data/class directory for direct use of user input in SQL queries without prepared statements or proper escaping. Look for instances where $_POST, $_GET, or $_REQUEST variables are concatenated directly into SQL strings.
    Affected if Code uses unsanitized user input directly in SQL queries without parameterized queries or input validation

If EC-CUBE is installed and the version falls within the affected ranges (2.3.0 and earlier, 1.4.7 and earlier, 1.5.0-beta2 and earlier, Community Edition 1.3.5 and earlier, or 1.3.4), and the application is accessible with user input being used in SQL queries without parameterization, the environment is affected.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of EC-CUBE. If upgrading is not feasible, implement input validation and convert all database queries to use parameterized queries/prepared statements to prevent SQL injection.

Fix this in Ec Cube Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-4991 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-4991 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data