Libpam MountApplication · Bkleineidam

CVE-2008-5138

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v2.0 Published 2008-11-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
passwdehd in libpam-mount 0.43 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a /tmp/passwdehd.##### temporary file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a symlink attack vulnerability in the passwdehd utility of libpam-mount version 0.43. The program creates temporary files in /tmp with predictable names (passwdehd.#####), allowing local unprivileged users to pre-create symlinks with matching names. When passwdehd runs (typically with elevated privileges as it's part of PAM), it follows the symlink and writes to an attacker-controlled location, enabling arbitrary file overwrite.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of libpam-mount that implements secure temporary file creation using mkstemp() or the O_EXCL flag to prevent symlink race conditions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Libpam MountApplication
Affected:= 0.43

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if libpam-mount is installed
    Run 'dpkg -l libpam-mount' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i libpam-mount' or 'ls -la /usr/bin/pmount' to see if the package is present
    Affected if The package is installed and version is 0.43 exactly, or if a version cannot be determined but the package exists on a system where the passwdehd utility runs with elevated privileges
  2. Identify the installed version of libpam-mount
    Run 'dpkg -s libpam-mount 2>/dev/null | grep Version' or 'rpm -q libpam-mount' to retrieve the exact version number
    Affected if The version returned is 0.43 (note: the '=' in the advisory indicates only version 0.43 is affected)
  3. Locate the passwdehd utility
    Run 'which passwdehd' or 'find /usr -name passwdehd -type f' to find the binary
    Affected if The passwdehd binary exists on the system (the vulnerability lies in its temporary file creation in /tmp)
  4. Check if PAM services use pam-mount
    Inspect PAM configuration files in /etc/pam.d/ for entries containing 'pam_mount.so' using 'grep -r pam_mount /etc/pam.d/'
    Affected if Any service (login, sshd, su, etc.) is configured to use pam_mount, meaning passwdehd may execute with elevated privileges during authentication
  5. Verify temp file creation behavior of passwdehd
    Observe /tmp for files matching pattern 'passwdehd.*****' during authentication or service restart; use 'ls -la /tmp/passwdehd*' to check for existing predictable temp files
    Affected if Files with predictable names matching passwdehd.##### pattern exist or can be created, confirming the vulnerable behavior

A system is affected if libpam-mount version 0.43 is installed AND pam_mount is configured in any PAM service, as this enables the passwdehd utility to run with elevated privileges and follow attacker-controlled symlinks in /tmp.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of libpam-mount that implements secure temporary file creation using mkstemp() or the O_EXCL flag to prevent symlink race conditions.

Fix this in Libpam Mount Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-5138 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-5138 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data