CVE-2008-5145
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedltpmenu in ltp 20060918 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a /tmp/runltp.mainmenu.##### temporary file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceltpmenu in LTP 20060918 creates temporary files with predictable names (/tmp/runltp.mainmenu.#####) without checking for existing symlinks or using secure file creation methods. A local attacker can pre-create a symlink with the expected filename to cause ltpmenu to overwrite arbitrary files owned by the user running the tool.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 20060918CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if LTP package is installedRun: dpkg -l | grep ltp or rpm -qa | grep ltpAffected if No LTP package is installed, then not affected
-
Identify installed LTP versionRun: dpkg -l ltp or rpm -q ltp to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if Version is exactly 20060918 (Debian package)
-
Verify ltpmenu binary existsRun: which ltpmenu or dpkg -L ltp | grep ltpmenuAffected if Binary exists and version is 20060918
-
Check temporary file creation behaviorExamine the ltpmenu source code or binary for /tmp/runltp.mainmenu pattern usage and lack of O_EXCL flag in open() callsAffected if Code uses predictable filenames without O_EXCL or mkstemp()
-
Inspect /tmp directory permissionsRun: ls -la /tmp | head to verify sticky bit is set (drwxrwxrwt)Affected if World-writable /tmp without sticky bit increases exploitability but does not change that the flaw exists
A user is affected if LTP version 20060918 is installed and the ltpmenu binary uses predictable temporary file names without secure creation methods.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace insecure temporary file creation with mkstemp() or open() with O_EXCL flag to prevent symlink attacks, or use a secure temporary directory with restricted permissions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-5145 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-5145 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data