Multimedia Communication Server 5100Application · Nortel

CVE-2008-5871

MEDIUM · 6.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-01-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Nortel Multimedia Communication Server (MSC) 5100 3.0.13 does not verify credentials during call placement, which allows remote attackers to spoof and redirect VoIP calls, possibly related to the snoop command.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Nortel Multimedia Communication Server (MSC) 5100 version 3.0.13 fails to verify credentials during VoIP call placement, enabling remote attackers to spoof or redirect calls. The vulnerability appears connected to the snoop command, likely allowing unauthorized monitoring or manipulation of call signaling.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Nortel MSC 5100 or migrate to a supported VoIP platform; if upgrade is not feasible, implement network-level authentication controls (e.g., SIP authentication, IPsec) and restrict access to the VoIP infrastructure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Multimedia Communication Server 5100Application
Affected:= 3.0.13

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Nortel MSC 5100 version
    Access the MSC administration interface or check system documentation for the installed software version. Look in the About or Version section of the MSC management console, or run the appropriate version command if available in the system CLI.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.0.13, which matches the affected version listed for this CVE.
  2. Verify snoop command status
    Check whether the snoop command functionality is enabled or accessible on the MSC system. Review system logs for any snoop command usage, and examine the VoIP configuration settings for diagnostic or monitoring features.
    Affected if The snoop command is enabled or accessible without authentication, indicating the vulnerability may be present.
  3. Confirm lack of credential verification on VoIP calls
    Review the VoIP call signaling configuration on the MSC system. Check whether SIP authentication or other credential validation is enforced during call placement. Test by placing a call and inspecting whether authentication headers are required.
    Affected if VoIP call placement proceeds without requiring credentials or authentication, leaving the system vulnerable to spoofing.
  4. Inspect for unauthorized call monitoring or redirection
    Review call logs and signaling records for any suspicious activity, such as calls from unrecognized sources, unexpected call redirects, or monitoring sessions that were not initiated by authorized users.
    Affected if Call records show unauthorized call placements, redirections, or monitoring activity that bypassed normal authentication controls.
  5. Assess network access to MSC VoIP services
    Examine network access controls and firewall rules protecting the MSC system. Determine whether VoIP ports and management interfaces are exposed to untrusted networks or lack IP-based restrictions.
    Affected if The MSC VoIP services are accessible from untrusted networks without additional authentication or IPsec protections.

A user is affected if their Nortel MSC 5100 is running version 3.0.13 and the system allows unauthenticated VoIP call placement or exposes the snoop command functionality without proper access controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Nortel MSC 5100 or migrate to a supported VoIP platform; if upgrade is not feasible, implement network-level authentication controls (e.g., SIP authentication, IPsec) and restrict access to the VoIP infrastructure.

Fix this in Multimedia Communication Server 5100 Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-5871 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-5871 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data