Openedit Digital Asset ManagementApplication · Openedit

CVE-2008-6239

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-02-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.0 or later.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenEdit Digital Asset Management (DAM) before 5.2014 allows remote attackers to perform unspecified actions as arbitrary users via unknown vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in OpenEdit Digital Asset Management (DAM) versions prior to 5.2014 allows remote attackers to trick authenticated users into unknowingly executing unintended actions. The attack exploits the web application's lack of proper request validation, enabling malicious requests to be processed with the victim's active session credentials.

MitigationUpgrade to OpenEdit DAM version 5.2014 or later which contains the CSRF fix. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers on server-side request handlers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openedit Digital Asset ManagementApplication
Affected:<= 5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenEdit DAM installation
    Locate the OpenEdit DAM installation directory and check for version files, typically found in version.properties, about.jsp, or the WAR file manifest. Alternatively, access the application's admin or 'About' page through the web interface.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.0 or any version prior to 5.2014
  2. Verify authenticated user sessions are enabled
    Check if the web application is configured to allow user authentication and session management. Review the application's web.xml or security configuration to confirm login functionality exists.
    Affected if User authentication and active sessions are enabled, as CSRF exploits require a victim's authenticated session to execute malicious requests
  3. Inspect state-changing forms for CSRF protection
    Examine the HTML source of forms that perform state-changing operations (such as user management, file uploads, configuration changes, or content modifications). Look for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens, security tokens, or unique request identifiers in form fields or headers.
    Affected if No anti-CSRF tokens or unique request validation tokens are present in state-changing forms, indicating the vulnerability remains unpatched
  4. Check Origin and Referer header validation
    Review server-side request handling code or configuration to determine if the application validates the Origin or Referer HTTP headers to verify request origin.
    Affected if The application does not validate Origin or Referer headers on state-changing operations, leaving CSRF protection absent

The environment is affected if OpenEdit DAM version 5.0 or earlier is installed and the application handles authenticated user sessions without anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation on state-changing operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to OpenEdit DAM version 5.2014 or later which contains the CSRF fix. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all state-changing operations and validate Origin/Referer headers on server-side request handlers.

Fix this in Openedit Digital Asset Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-6239 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-6239 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data