CVE-2008-6707
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Web management interface in Avaya SIP Enablement Services (SES) 3.x and 4.0, as used with Avaya Communication Manager 3.1.x, does not perform authentication for certain functionality, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and access restricted functionality via (1) the certificate installation utility, (2) unspecified scripts in the objects folder, (3) an "unnecessary default application," (4) unspecified scripts in the states folder, (5) an unspecified "default application" that lists server configuration, and (6) "full system help."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Avaya SIP Enablement Services (SES) 3.x and 4.0 web management interface fails to enforce authentication on multiple endpoints including certificate installation utilities, scripts in objects/states folders, and certain default applications. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access sensitive system configuration information and restricted management functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0= 3.1= 3.1.1= 4.0= 3.1= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.1.3= 3.1.4= 3.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Avaya SES versionCheck the version of Avaya SIP Enablement Services installed on the system by reviewing system inventory, installed software list, or the about page of the SES web management interfaceAffected if The installed version is 3.0, 3.1, 3.1.1, or 4.0
-
Identify installed Avaya Communication Manager versionCheck the version of Avaya Communication Manager installed by reviewing system inventory or checking the CM administration interfaceAffected if The installed version is 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, or 3.1.5
-
Confirm web management interface is accessibleAttempt to reach the SES web management interface over HTTP/HTTPS from a network locationAffected if The web interface is reachable and responds to requests
-
Test certificate installation utility accessAttempt to access the certificate installation utility endpoint (such as /certinst or similar certificate-related paths) without providing any authentication credentialsAffected if The endpoint returns sensitive configuration data or allows management actions without being prompted for login
-
Test objects/states scripts accessAttempt to access scripts in the objects/states folders (such as /objects/ or /states/ paths) without authenticationAffected if These scripts are accessible and return system information or allow configuration changes without authentication
-
Test default applications accessAttempt to access default applications that ship with the SES installation without authenticationAffected if These applications are accessible and expose management functionality without requiring credentials
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed Avaya SES (3.0-4.0) or Communication Manager (3.1-3.1.5) versions AND the web management interface is exposed with unauthenticated access to certificate utilities, objects/states scripts, or default applications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to the SES management interface to trusted internal IPs only, disable unnecessary default applications and exposed scripts, and apply vendor-provided patches for this authentication bypass vulnerability.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-6707 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- support.avaya.com
- osvdb.org
- osvdb.org
- osvdb.org
- secunia.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.voipshield.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-6707 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data