Tivoli Directory ServerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2008-7288

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2011-04-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Tivoli Directory Server (TDS) 5.2 before 5.2.0.5-TIV-ITDS-LA0007 on AIX allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server destabilization) via an anonymous DIGEST-MD5 LDAP Bind operation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Tivoli Directory Server 5.2 on AIX contains a flaw where anonymous LDAP Bind operations using the DIGEST-MD5 authentication mechanism can destabilize the server, causing a denial of service. The vulnerability exists in versions prior to 5.2.0.5-TIV-ITDS-LA0007.

MitigationUpgrade IBM Tivoli Directory Server to version 5.2.0.5-TIV-ITDS-LA0007 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider disabling anonymous bind or restricting unauthenticated access at the network perimeter until the patch can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tivoli Directory ServerApplication
Affected:= 5.2.0= 5.2.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM Tivoli Directory Server is installed
    Run 'lsdev -C -c ldap' or check for the presence of the ITDS installation directory (typically /opt/ibm/ldap/V5.2)
    Affected if The product is not present on the system
  2. Check the installed ITDS version
    Run 'idsversion' command from the installation directory or check the version file in /opt/ibm/ldap/V5.2
    Affected if The version is 5.2.0 or 5.2.0.4 (prior to 5.2.0.5-TIV-ITDS-LA0007)
  3. Confirm the platform is AIX
    Run 'uname -a' or 'oslevel' to verify the operating system
    Affected if The server is running on AIX (the vulnerability is specific to AIX)
  4. Verify anonymous LDAP bind is enabled
    Use the ldapsearch utility or ITDS admin tool to query the anonymous bind configuration setting (cn=configuration,cn=localhost) for 'ibm-slapdAllowAnonymousBind'
    Affected if Anonymous bind is enabled (value is true or 1)
  5. Check if DIGEST-MD5 authentication mechanism is configured
    Examine the ITDS authentication configuration for the presence of DIGEST-MD5 in the supported SASL mechanisms (check cn=sasl,cn=configuration)
    Affected if DIGEST-MD5 is listed as an enabled or supported SASL mechanism

A user is affected if they run IBM Tivoli Directory Server version 5.2.0 or 5.2.0.4 on AIX with anonymous bind enabled and DIGEST-MD5 authentication available.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade IBM Tivoli Directory Server to version 5.2.0.5-TIV-ITDS-LA0007 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider disabling anonymous bind or restricting unauthenticated access at the network perimeter until the patch can be applied.

Fix this in Tivoli Directory Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2008-7288 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2008-7288 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data