CVE-2009-0200
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger underflow in OpenOffice.org (OOo) before 3.1.1 and StarOffice/StarSuite 7, 8, and 9 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted records in the document table of a Word document, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger underflow vulnerability in OpenOffice.org's Word document parser when processing crafted records in the document table. The underflow leads to a heap-based buffer overflow that can be exploited for arbitrary code execution via specially crafted Word documents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.1= 1.0-ru= 1.0.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3.1= 1.1= 1.1.1= 1.1.2= 1.1.3= 1.1.4= 1.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenOffice.org installationOn Linux systems, run 'rpm -qa | grep -i openoffice' or 'dpkg -l | grep openoffice'. On Windows, check Program Files for OpenOffice.org folder. On Mac, check /Applications for OpenOffice.orgAffected if If no OpenOffice.org package is found, the system is not affected by this CVE
-
Determine installed OpenOffice.org versionOn Linux RPM systems: 'rpm -q --queryformat "%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}" openoffice.org-core'. On Linux DEB systems: 'dpkg -s openoffice.org-core 2>/dev/null | grep Version'. On Windows: locate soffice.exe in the OpenOffice.org program folder, right-click, select Properties, and check the Version tabAffected if If the installed version is 3.1 or lower, or matches any of these exact versions: 1.0-ru, 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3.1, 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.1.4, 1.1.5, then the installation is vulnerable
-
Confirm Word document import capabilityLaunch OpenOffice Writer, attempt to open a .doc file, or check if the Word document import filter is listed in Tools > Options > Load/Save > File FormatsAffected if If Word document filters are available and users can open .doc files, the vulnerable parser code is present and can be triggered
The environment is affected if OpenOffice.org version is 3.1 or lower, or matches any of the specific 1.0-x or 1.1.x versions listed, and the application is used to open Word documents.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade OpenOffice.org to version 3.1.1 or later, or apply vendor-specific patches for StarOffice/StarSuite. Until patched, avoid opening Word documents from untrusted sources.
OpenOffice.org 3.1.1
- Upgrade OpenOffice.org to version 3.1.1 or later to remediate the integer underflow vulnerability
- For StarOffice/StarSuite, contact Oracle/Sun Microsystems for vendor-specific patches for versions 7, 8, and 9
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0200 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.vupen.com
- development.openoffice.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- www.debian.org
- www.gentoo.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.openoffice.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0200 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data