CVE-2009-0411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGoogle Chrome before 1.0.154.46 does not properly restrict access from web pages to the (1) Set-Cookie and (2) Set-Cookie2 HTTP response headers, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from cookies via XMLHttpRequest calls and other web script.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGoogle Chrome before 1.0.154.46 did not properly restrict web page access to Set-Cookie and Set-Cookie2 HTTP response headers, allowing malicious web pages to retrieve sensitive cookie data via XMLHttpRequest calls and other client-side scripts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.154.43= 0.2.152.1= 0.2.153.1= 0.3.154.0= 0.3.154.3= 0.4.154.18= 0.4.154.22= 0.4.154.31= 0.4.154.33= 1.0.154.36= 1.0.154.39= 1.0.154.42CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Google Chrome versionOpen Google Chrome, click the wrench icon (Tools menu), then select 'About Google Chrome'. The version number is displayed on that page.Affected if The displayed version is any of these: 0.2.152.1, 0.2.153.1, 0.3.154.0, 0.3.154.3, 0.4.154.18, 0.4.154.22, 0.4.154.31, 0.4.154.33, 1.0.154.36, 1.0.154.39, 1.0.154.42, or any version 1.0.154.43 or earlier.
-
Confirm the version number preciselyOn the About page, note the full version string including any build numbers (for example: 1.0.154.42). Compare exactly against the affected version list provided in the CVE.Affected if The exact version matches any version listed as affected in the CVE.
-
Verify whether the browser processes web contentDetermine if Chrome is used as a general-purpose web browser to visit external websites, or if it accesses untrusted web applications. This vulnerability is triggered when malicious web content is loaded in the browser.Affected if The vulnerable Chrome version is actively used to browse the web or access untrusted web applications where an attacker could inject malicious scripts.
You are affected if your installed Google Chrome version is 1.0.154.43 or earlier, or exactly matches any of the specific affected versions listed, and you use the browser to access web content.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Google Chrome to version 1.0.154.46 or later to obtain the security fix that properly protects cookie headers from being accessed by web content.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data