ZeroshellApplication

CVE-2009-0545

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-02-12
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
cgi-bin/kerbynet in ZeroShell 1.0beta11 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the type parameter in a NoAuthREQ x509List action.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CVE-2009-0545 is a high-severity vulnerability in ZeroShell 1.0beta11 and earlier, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands through shell metacharacters in the type parameter of a NoAuthREQ x509List action. This can lead to unauthorized command execution on the affected system.

MitigationTo remediate this vulnerability, it is essential to upgrade to a version of ZeroShell that is not affected by this issue. Additionally, input validation should be implemented to sanitize user inputs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ZeroshellApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if ZeroShell is installed
    Check for the presence of ZeroShell by looking for its web interface on common ports (80, 443) or check for ZeroShell-related processes or directories on the system.
    Affected if ZeroShell is found running on the system.
  2. Determine the ZeroShell version
    Access the ZeroShell web interface and look for version information typically displayed on the login page or in the admin dashboard, or check system files that may contain version metadata.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0beta11 or any earlier version within the 1.0 release line.
  3. Verify the x509List endpoint is accessible
    Attempt to access the NoAuthREQ x509List action endpoint. This is typically found in the authentication/certificate management portion of the ZeroShell web interface.
    Affected if The x509List action is accessible without authentication and accepts user input through the type parameter.
  4. Check for unauthenticated access to certificate functions
    Test whether the NoAuthREQ parameter allows access to certificate listing functions without requiring login credentials.
    Affected if The system returns certificate data or accepts the type parameter without requiring authentication.

A system is affected if it is running ZeroShell version 1.0beta11 or earlier, and the x509List action with the NoAuthREQ parameter is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch www.zeroshell.net →
Interim mitigation

To remediate this vulnerability, it is essential to upgrade to a version of ZeroShell that is not affected by this issue. Additionally, input validation should be implemented to sanitize user inputs.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest stable ZeroShell release (post-1.0beta11)

  1. 1. Download the latest stable ZeroShell release from the official vendor website at http://www.zeroshell.net/eng/
  2. 2. Review the release notes and changelog to confirm the fix for CVE-2009-0545 is included
  3. 3. Create a full backup of the current ZeroShell configuration before upgrading
  4. 4. Follow the official upgrade instructions specific to your ZeroShell deployment method (ISO, USB, or virtual appliance)
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify that the cgi-bin/kerbynet endpoint no longer accepts shell metacharacters in the type parameter
  6. 6. Test that the x509List functionality works correctly with valid inputs
Caveat Review migration guide for configuration compatibility between beta and stable releases

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Zeroshell Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get the patch applied

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0545 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0545 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data