CVE-2009-0583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple integer overflows in icc.c in the International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (aka icclib), as used in Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier and Argyll Color Management System (CMS) 1.0.3 and earlier, allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by using a device file for a translation request that operates on a crafted image file and targets a certain "native color space," related to an ICC profile in a (1) PostScript or (2) PDF file with embedded images.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple integer overflows in icc.c in the ICC Format library (icclib), as used by Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier and Argyll CMS 1.0.3 and earlier, allow heap-based buffer overflows when parsing crafted ICC profiles embedded in PostScript or PDF image files targeting certain native color spaces, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.64= 5.50= 7.05= 7.07= 8.0.1= 8.15= 8.15.2= 8.54= 8.56= 8.57= 8.61= 8.62<= 1.0.3= 0.1.0= 0.2.0= 0.2.1= 0.2.2= 0.3.0= 0.6.0= 0.7.0= 1.0.0= 1.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Ghostscript versionRun 'gs --version' or check the installed Ghostscript package versionAffected if The version is 8.64 or earlier, or matches one of the affected versions: 5.50, 7.05, 7.07, 8.0.1, 8.15, 8.15.2, 8.54, 8.56, 8.57, 8.61, 8.62
-
Check Argyll CMS versionRun 'arc' or 'tiff2icc --version' if available, or check the installed Argyll CMS package versionAffected if The version is 1.0.3 or earlier, or matches one of the affected versions: 0.1.0, 0.2.0, 0.2.1, 0.2.2, 0.3.0, 0.6.0, 0.7.0, 1.0.0, 1.0.2
-
Identify if ICC profile processing is usedSearch for PDF or PostScript files processed by Ghostscript, or ICC profile conversion tasks run via Argyll CMS tools like 'tiff2icc', 'icclib' utilities, or 'cmm'Affected if Ghostscript or Argyll CMS is used to parse ICC profiles from untrusted PostScript or PDF image files targeting native color spaces
-
Locate the icc.c componentCheck for the presence of the icclib library or source code if bundled in a custom application, and identify if it handles ICC profile parsingAffected if A custom application bundles icclib version affected by the integer overflows in icc.c and processes ICC profiles
Your environment is affected if Ghostscript version 8.64 or earlier, or Argyll CMS version 1.0.3 or earlier (or any of the specific listed versions) is installed and used to parse ICC profiles from PostScript or PDF files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Ghostscript 8.65+ and Argyll CMS 1.0.4+, or apply vendor patches for icclib to address integer overflows in ICC profile parsing. Sandbox or restrict processing of untrusted PostScript/PDF files with embedded images until patches are applied.
Ghostscript 8.70+ or latest stable; Argyll CMS 1.1.0+ or latest stable
- 1. Identify which affected product (Ghostscript or Argyll CMS) is in use in your environment
- 2. For Ghostscript: Check current version with 'gs --version' or 'gs -v'
- 3. For Argyll CMS: Check current version with 'spotread -v' or 'applycal -v' or consult the installed package
- 4. Upgrade Ghostscript to version 8.70 or later (the first stable release after 8.64 that addressed this vulnerability)
- 5. Upgrade Argyll CMS to version 1.1.0 or later (the first stable release after 1.0.3 that addressed this vulnerability)
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- 7. Test that PostScript/PDF processing with embedded ICC profiles works correctly with the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- wiki.rpath.com
- www.debian.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- bugs.gentoo.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- securitytracker.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- support.avaya.com
- www.auscert.org.au
- www.gentoo.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mandriva.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vupen.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- issues.rpath.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- usn.ubuntu.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data