Application Networking ManagerApplication · Cisco

CVE-2009-0616

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-02-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.2 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco Application Networking Manager (ANM) before 2.0 uses default usernames and passwords, which makes it easier for remote attackers to access the application, or cause a denial of service via configuration changes, related to "default user credentials during installation."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco Application Networking Manager (ANM) versions prior to 2.0 ship with hardcoded default usernames and passwords that are known to attackers. This allows remote unauthenticated attackers to gain full administrative access to the application, enabling them to modify configurations and potentially cause denial of service.

MitigationImmediately change all default credentials on affected ANM installations and upgrade to version 2.0 or later. Restrict network access to the management interface to prevent unauthorized external access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Application Networking ManagerApplication
Affected:<= 1.2= 1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Cisco ANM version
    Access the ANM management interface and navigate to Help > About, or check the version displayed on the login page. Alternatively, check the installation directory for a version file or review the software release notes.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.1, 1.2, or any version number less than 2.0 (such as 1.0.x)
  2. Verify default administrative credentials are active
    Attempt to log in to the ANM web interface using the known default username and password combination for the version. The default account credentials shipped with the product should still be active.
    Affected if Default credentials (username and password that shipped with the software) are still enabled and not changed from factory defaults
  3. Confirm network exposure of ANM management interface
    Determine if the ANM management interface is reachable from external networks or untrusted segments. Check firewall rules, ACLs, or network connectivity that allow access to TCP ports used by ANM (typically HTTPS port 443).
    Affected if The ANM management interface is accessible from networks outside the trusted administrative zone, particularly the internet

You are affected if Cisco ANM version 1.1 or 1.2 (or any version prior to 2.0) is installed and the default administrative credentials have not been changed, especially if the interface is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.2
Interim mitigation

Immediately change all default credentials on affected ANM installations and upgrade to version 2.0 or later. Restrict network access to the management interface to prevent unauthorized external access.

Recommended fix High confidence

Version 2.0 or later

  1. Backup the current ANM configuration before starting the upgrade process
  2. Obtain Cisco Application Networking Manager version 2.0 or later from Cisco
  3. Follow Cisco's standard upgrade procedure for ANM to install version 2.0
  4. After upgrade, access the application and change all default usernames and passwords to strong, unique credentials
  5. Verify the application is functioning correctly with the new credentials

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Application Networking Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0616 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0616 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data