CVE-2009-0626
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SSLVPN feature in Cisco IOS 12.3 through 12.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload or hang) via a crafted HTTPS packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDenial of service vulnerability in Cisco IOS SSLVPN feature affecting versions 12.3 through 12.4. Remote unauthenticated attackers can cause affected devices to reload or hang by sending specially crafted HTTPS packets to the SSLVPN service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3= 12.3b= 12.3bc= 12.3bw= 12.3ja= 12.3jea= 12.3jeb= 12.3jec= 12.3jk= 12.3jl= 12.3jx= 12.3tCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS versionRun 'show version' or 'show ios version' on the device CLI to retrieve the installed IOS version string (for example, 12.3(11)T or 12.4(15)T)Affected if The version matches 12.3.x, 12.3, or 12.4.x variants listed in the affected versions (12.3, 12.3b, 12.3bc, 12.3bw, 12.3ja, 12.3jea, 12.3jeb, 12.3jec, 12.3jk, 12.3jl, 12.3jx, 12.3t, or 12.4 versions)
-
Determine if SSLVPN (WebVPN) is configuredRun 'show webvpn' or 'show sslvpn' to check if SSLVPN/WebVPN is enabled on the deviceAffected if SSLVPN or WebVPN is actively configured and running on the device
-
Verify HTTPS service is listening for SSLVPNRun 'show ip http server status' or 'show running-config | include webvpn' to confirm the HTTPS service is bound to SSLVPN functionalityAffected if HTTPS service is enabled and serving SSLVPN/WebVPN connections (typically port 443)
-
Check for active SSLVPN sessionsRun 'show webvpn session' or 'show sslvpn session' to see if any SSLVPN sessions are activeAffected if Any SSLVPN sessions are active, indicating the vulnerable service is reachable
You are affected if the device runs a Cisco IOS version between 12.3 and 12.4 and has SSLVPN/WebVPN enabled with HTTPS access exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco IOS patches or upgrade to a fixed version beyond 12.4 that addresses this vulnerability. Plan maintenance window and ensure backup configurations before upgrade.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0626 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0626 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data