CVE-2009-0844
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe get_input_token function in the SPNEGO implementation in MIT Kerberos 5 (aka krb5) 1.5 through 1.6.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) and possibly obtain sensitive information via a crafted length value that triggers a buffer over-read.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe get_input_token function in the SPNEGO implementation of MIT Kerberos 5 versions 1.5 through 1.6.3 contains a buffer over-read vulnerability. A remote attacker can send a crafted length value that causes the function to read beyond buffer boundaries, leading to daemon crash (denial of service) and potential information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5-1.6.3all versions= 1.5= 1.5.1= 1.5.2= 1.5.3= 1.6= 1.6.1= 1.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MIT Kerberos 5 installation and versionRun 'krb5-config --version' or check package manager (dpkg -l krb5, rpm -q krb5)Affected if Version is 1.5.x, 1.6.x, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, or 1.6.3 (falls within 1.5 through 1.6.3 range)
-
Confirm the SPNEGO GSS-API mechanism is in useInspect Kerberos configuration files (/etc/krb5.conf) for 'GSSAPIMech' or 'mechs' settings, or check application logs for SPNEGO/GSSAPI usageAffected if SPNEGO (security mechanism) is enabled or applications use GSS-API authentication with SPNEGO
-
Verify the krb5-libs or krb5-server packagesQuery installed packages: 'rpm -qa | grep -i krb5' (RHEL/CentOS) or 'dpkg -l | grep -i krb5' (Debian)Affected if Package version matches the vulnerable 1.5-1.6.3 range
System is affected if MIT Kerberos 5 version 1.5 through 1.6.3 is installed and SPNEGO/GSS-API authentication is in use
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade MIT Kerberos 5 to version 1.6.4 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling SPNEGO or restricting network access to Kerberos services as a temporary measure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0844 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- lists.apple.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- sunsolve.sun.com
- support.apple.com
- support.avaya.com
- support.novell.com
- support.novell.com
- web.mit.edu
- wiki.rpath.com
- wiki.rpath.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0844 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data