CVE-2009-0867
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe HRM-S service in Fujitsu Enhanced Support Facility 3.0 and 3.0.1 allows remote attackers to obtain (1) hardware and (2) software information via unspecified requests in a client connection.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe HRM-S service in Fujitsu Enhanced Support Facility versions 3.0 and 3.0.1 exposes sensitive hardware and software inventory information to remote unauthenticated attackers via unspecified requests during client connections. This information disclosure could aid further attacks by revealing system configuration details.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0= 3.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Fujitsu Enhanced Support Facility is installedCheck for the presence of Fujitsu Enhanced Support Facility software on the system - look for the application in installed programs or check for related processes/servicesAffected if The software is installed and running
-
Identify the installed versionUse system utility to view installed software version information for Fujitsu Enhanced Support Facility, or check the application's 'About' or version informationAffected if The version is exactly 3.0 or 3.0.1
-
Determine if HRM-S service is runningCheck running services or processes for HRM-S or related components of Fujitsu Enhanced Support FacilityAffected if HRM-S service is active on the system
-
Check network exposure of HRM-S serviceReview firewall rules, network configuration, or use network scanning to determine if the HRM-S service port is accessible from external network locationsAffected if HRM-S service is reachable from remote unauthenticated network positions
A system is affected if Fujitsu Enhanced Support Facility versions 3.0 or 3.0.1 are installed with the HRM-S service running and exposed to unauthenticated network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a supported version of Fujitsu Enhanced Support Facility if available; otherwise, restrict network access to the HRM-S service using firewall rules or network segmentation to prevent unauthorized external access.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0867 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0867 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data