CVE-2009-0973
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Cluster Ready Services component in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 allows remote attackers to affect availability via unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVulnerability in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 Cluster Ready Services (CRS) component allows remote attackers to impact system availability through unspecified vectors. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely with low complexity, though the exact attack method is not disclosed in Oracle's advisory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.1.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Oracle Database installationQuery the Oracle inventory directory (typically /etc/oraInst.loc on Linux/Unix or registry on Windows) or check for ORACLE_HOME environment variableAffected if No Oracle Database installation is found or ORACLE_HOME is not set
-
Confirm the exact Oracle Database versionRun: sqlplus / as sysdba, then execute SELECT VERSION FROM PRODUCT_COMPONENT_VERSION WHERE PRODUCT LIKE 'Oracle%'; or check $ORACLE_HOME/oracle/orapw file version, or check opatch lsinventoryAffected if The installed version is exactly 10.1.0.5 (not 10.1.0.4, 10.2.x, or later)
-
Check if Cluster Ready Services (CRS) component is installedOn Linux/Unix systems, check if the CRS home exists under /opt/oracle/crs or /u01/app/oracle/product/10.1.0/crs, or run: crsctl query crs activeversion 2>/dev/nullAffected if CRS is installed and the CRS home directory exists on the system (vulnerability only applies if CRS is present)
-
Verify CRS versionRun: $CRS_HOME/bin/crsctl query crs activeversion or check the CRS inventory fileAffected if CRS version reports 10.1.0.5 (indicating the exact vulnerable version)
A user is affected if they have Oracle Database 10g version 10.1.0.5 with the Cluster Ready Services (CRS) component installed and active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for April 2009 or later, or upgrade to a supported Oracle Database version as 10.1.0.5 is well beyond extended support.
- Consultation16.0 h
- Implementation40.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $24,704.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-0973 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-0973 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data