RapidleechApplication

CVE-2009-1089

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-03-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in upload.php in Rapidleech rev.36 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a base64-encoded absolute path in the filename parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Absolute path traversal vulnerability in upload.php in Rapidleech rev.36 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the server by providing a base64-encoded absolute path in the filename parameter. The application fails to properly validate/sanitize this input before using it in file operations, enabling an attacker to escape the intended directory and access sensitive system files.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Rapidleech that properly validates and sanitizes the filename parameter, rejecting base64-encoded paths and enforcing path restrictions. If no upgrade is available, implement input validation that blocks path traversal sequences and rejects absolute path inputs.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RapidleechApplication
Affected:<= rev36

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Rapidleech installation exists
    Locate the Rapidleech application directory on the server by searching for characteristic files such as index.php, config.php, or a folder named 'rapidleech'. Use file system search commands like 'find /var/www -name "index.php" -path "*rapidleech*"' or similar.
    Affected if Rapidleech is found installed on the server
  2. Identify the Rapidleech revision version
    Open the main Rapidleech index.php or a known version file and look for a revision number, version string, or build identifier. Common locations include a version.php file, the footer in index.php, or a CHANGELOG file.
    Affected if The revision number is 36 or lower, or the version is otherwise indicated as rev36 or earlier
  3. Verify upload.php is present and accessible
    Check for the existence of upload.php within the Rapidleech directory. Use commands like 'ls -la [rapidleech_path]/upload.php' or verify via web server access logs if the file has been requested.
    Affected if upload.php exists in the Rapidleech installation directory
  4. Check if filename parameter accepts base64-encoded input without validation
    Examine the upload.php source code for the handling of the 'filename' parameter. Look for base64 decoding operations (such as base64_decode) applied to user input without subsequent path validation, and verify there is no check blocking absolute paths or path traversal sequences (such as '../', absolute paths starting with '/').
    Affected if The code base64-decodes the filename parameter and uses the result in file operations without validating that it does not contain absolute paths or traversal sequences

The environment is affected if Rapidleech rev36 or earlier is installed with upload.php present and the filename parameter accepts base64-encoded absolute paths without validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Rapidleech that properly validates and sanitizes the filename parameter, rejecting base64-encoded paths and enforcing path restrictions. If no upgrade is available, implement input validation that blocks path traversal sequences and rejects absolute path inputs.

Fix this in Rapidleech Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,570
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-1089 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-1089 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data