CVE-2009-2415
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple integer overflows in memcached 1.1.12 and 1.2.2 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving length attributes that trigger heap-based buffer overflows.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflows in memcached's handling of length attributes allow remote attackers to trigger heap-based buffer overflows, leading to arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability affects versions 1.1.12 and 1.2.2.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1.12= 1.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify memcached binary versionRun 'memcached -h' or 'memcached -V' to display version information, or check the package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -l | grep memcached' or 'rpm -qa | grep memcached')Affected if The displayed version is exactly 1.1.12 or 1.2.2
-
Confirm running memcached processCheck for running memcached processes using 'ps aux | grep memcached' or 'pgrep memcached'Affected if A memcached process is running and its version (from step 1) matches 1.1.12 or 1.2.2
-
Verify network exposureCheck which interfaces memcached is listening on using 'netstat -tlnp | grep memcached' or 'ss -tlnp | grep memcached'Affected if Memcached is bound to a network interface (0.0.0.0 or non-loopback IP) rather than only localhost (127.0.0.1)
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade memcached to a patched version (1.2.5 or later) that properly validates length attributes and prevents integer overflow conditions.
memcached 1.2.3 or later (1.4 series recommended for production)
- 1. Identify the exact memcached version currently running using: memcached -h or checking the package manager
- 2. Stop the memcached service: systemctl stop memcached or service memcached stop
- 3. For Debian-based systems, update package lists: apt-get update
- 4. Install the updated memcached package: apt-get install memcached
- 5. Verify the new version is installed: memcached -h | head -1
- 6. Start the memcached service: systemctl start memcached or service memcached start
- 7. Review memcached configuration in /etc/memcached.conf to ensure secure settings (disable UDP if not needed, bind to localhost)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2415 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2415 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data