CVE-2009-2528
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGDI+ in Microsoft Office XP SP3 does not properly handle malformed objects in Office Art Property Tables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document that triggers memory corruption, aka "Memory Corruption Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in GDI+ within Microsoft Office XP SP3. The vulnerability exists because GDI+ fails to properly validate malformed objects embedded in Office Art Property Tables. When a user opens a specially crafted Office document containing these malformed objects, it triggers memory corruption that can be exploited for arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= 1.1= 2.0= 6= 2005= 2008= 2005CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Office XP SP3 is installedOpen Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Common\InstallRoot, or run 'reg query "HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Common\InstallRoot" /v InstallRoot'Affected if The key exists and points to an Office XP installation path, indicating Office XP is present
-
Confirm Office XP Service Pack levelRun 'reg query "HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Office\11.0\Common\InstallRoot" /v Version' or check Windows Update history for Office XP SP3 updatesAffected if Version shows a build prior to the patch date or SP3 is not listed in installed updates
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'Affected if Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, or Windows Server 2008 is reported
-
Verify GDI+ component versionLocate gdiplus.dll in C:\Windows\System32 (for 32-bit) or C:\Windows\SysWOW64 (for 64-bit), right-click and view Properties > Details to see File VersionAffected if GDI+ version is earlier than the patched version released in MS09-062 (typically below 5.1.3102.1355)
-
Check if Office file processing is commonReview installed Office applications, check for Microsoft Word, Excel, or PowerPoint executables in Program Files, or query 'wmic product where "name like 'Microsoft Office%'" get name, version'Affected if Office XP applications are present and capable of opening .doc, .xls, or .ppt files containing Art Property Tables
If the system runs Windows XP/2003/Vista/2008 with Office XP SP3 installed and the GDI+ version is unpatched, the environment is vulnerable when processing Office documents from any source.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security updates for Office XP SP3 to patch the GDI+ vulnerability. Until patched, avoid opening Office documents from untrusted sources and consider restricting file types or using updated Office versions.
Upgrade from Office XP to a supported version such as Office 2007 or Office 2010; for Windows XP/2003, upgrade to a supported Windows version
- Apply Microsoft Security Update MS09-062 (GDI+ Vulnerability) which addresses CVE-2009-2528
- If running Office XP, ensure Service Pack 3 is installed, then apply the specific GDI+ security patch
- For Internet Explorer 6, ensure the Cumulative Security Update is applied
- For systems that cannot be patched, consider upgrading to a supported Office version (Office 2007 or later)
- Ensure Windows Update is configured and all security updates are applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2528 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2528 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data