CVE-2009-2863
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRace condition in the Firewall Authentication Proxy feature in Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication, or bypass the consent web page, via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCsy15227.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in the Firewall Authentication Proxy feature in Cisco IOS versions 12.0 through 12.4 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication mechanisms or bypass the consent web page by sending crafted requests.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0xk= 12.0xr= 12.1= 12.1e= 12.1ex= 12.1t= 12.1xc= 12.1xh= 12.1xi= 12.1xj= 12.1xm= 12.1xpCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device operating systemRun 'show version' or check the device prompt/boot sequence to confirm the device runs Cisco IOS (not IOS-XE, NX-OS, ASA, or other platforms)Affected if The device is not running Cisco IOS - this vulnerability only affects Cisco IOS
-
Determine the Cisco IOS versionExecute 'show version' and locate the version string (for example, 12.1(3)T or 12.0(5)S)Affected if The installed IOS version matches or falls within the 12.0xk, 12.0xr, 12.1, 12.1e, 12.1ex, 12.1t, 12.1xc, 12.1xh, 12.1xi, 12.1xj, 12.1xm, or 12.1xp trains listed as affected
-
Check if Firewall Authentication Proxy is enabledRun 'show running-config | include authentication' or 'show ip auth-proxy' to inspect the configuration for authentication proxy settingsAffected if Firewall Authentication Proxy (also called auth-proxy or IP Auth-proxy) is configured and active on any interface
The device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS versions 12.0xk, 12.0xr, 12.1 through 12.1xp and has the Firewall Authentication Proxy feature enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IOS to a version beyond 12.4 that addresses this vulnerability; if immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement additional network-level access controls and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2863 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2863 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data