CVE-2009-2867
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.2XNA, 12.2XNB, 12.2XNC, 12.2XND, 12.4T, 12.4XZ, and 12.4YA, when Zone-Based Policy Firewall SIP Inspection is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted SIP transit packet, aka Bug ID CSCsr18691.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS versions 12.2XNA through 12.2XND, 12.4T, 12.4XZ, and 12.4YA. When Zone-Based Policy Firewall with SIP Inspection is enabled, a remote attacker can send a specially crafted SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) transit packet to cause the device to reload, resulting in a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.2xna= 12.2xnb= 12.2xnc= 12.2xnd= 12.4t= 12.4xz= 12.4ya= 12.4ybCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI and locate the software version string (e.g., 12.4(15)T1)Affected if The version matches or falls within 12.2xna through 12.2xnd, 12.4t, 12.4xz, or 12.4ya train
-
Verify Zone-Based Policy Firewall is configuredRun 'show zone-pair security' to list configured zone-pairs and their policy configurationsAffected if Any zone-pair shows a policy-map configured (indicating ZBFW is active)
-
Confirm SIP inspection is enabledRun 'show policy-map type inspect zone-pair' and look for the 'sip' protocol in the inspect configuration, or run 'show class-map type inspect' to list inspected protocolsAffected if SIP protocol inspection is explicitly configured in the policy-map for an active zone-pair
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable IOS version within the 12.2XNA through 12.2XND, 12.4T, 12.4XZ, or 12.4YA trains AND has Zone-Based Policy Firewall with SIP inspection actively enabled on a zone-pair.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched Cisco IOS version or apply the relevant security update. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling SIP inspection if not required, or implement ACLs to filter suspicious SIP traffic at network boundaries.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2867 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2867 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data