CVE-2009-2956
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe (1) Net.Commerce and (2) Net.Data components in IBM WebSphere Commerce Suite store sensitive information under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to discover passwords, and database and filesystem details, via direct requests for configuration files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM WebSphere Commerce Suite Net.Commerce and Net.Data components store sensitive configuration files (containing passwords, database credentials, and filesystem paths) under the web root without proper access controls. Remote attackers can directly request these files to harvest sensitive information used for further attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBM WebSphere Commerce Suite installationSearch for IBM WebSphere Commerce Suite or Net.Commerce/Net.Data components on the system. Check common installation directories such as /opt/ibm/commerce or C:\Program Files\IBM\WebSphere Commerce. Look for the nchandler.exe (Net.Commerce) or net.data.exe (Net.Data) processes running on the server.Affected if The product is installed and contains Net.Commerce or Net.Data components.
-
Identify the web root directoryLocate the web server document root configured for Net.Commerce or Net.Data. This is typically defined in the NetCommerce or NetData configuration files, often in a config subdirectory or the main installation directory.Affected if A web root directory is configured for the Net.Commerce or Net.Data web server.
-
Enumerate configuration files under the web rootList all files in the identified web root directory and any subdirectories. Look for files with extensions such as .ini, .cfg, .conf, .xml, .dat, or configuration files with names suggesting sensitive content (e.g., containing words like password, config, db, credentials).Affected if Sensitive configuration files (containing passwords, database credentials, or filesystem paths) exist under the web root.
-
Test unauthenticated HTTP access to configuration filesUsing a web browser or curl/wget, attempt to directly request the identified configuration files via HTTP without providing any authentication. For example: http://<server>/<config-file-name>. If the file content is returned in the response, the file is accessible.Affected if Configuration files can be retrieved via HTTP without authentication, exposing sensitive contents.
If IBM WebSphere Commerce Suite with Net.Commerce or Net.Data is running and sensitive configuration files containing passwords, database credentials, or filesystem paths are accessible via direct HTTP requests without authentication, the environment is affected by CVE-2009-2956.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRelocate sensitive configuration files outside the web root directory and implement proper file system permissions to prevent unauthenticated access. Alternatively, remove or rename exposed configuration files if they are not required for web serving.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2956 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2956 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data