CVE-2009-2976
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco Aironet Lightweight Access Point (AP) devices send the contents of certain multicast data frames in cleartext, which allows remote attackers to discover Wireless LAN Controller MAC addresses and IP addresses, and AP configuration details, by sniffing the wireless network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco Aironet Lightweight Access Point devices transmit certain multicast data frames in cleartext without encryption. By sniffing wireless traffic, remote attackers can discover Wireless LAN Controller MAC and IP addresses along with AP configuration details, leading to network reconnaissance and further attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Aironet AP1100 or AP1200 devices in your networkLog into your wireless network management system or physically inspect access points to confirm the model numbers. Check your network inventory systems for these specific model designations.Affected if You have deployed Cisco Aironet AP1100 or AP1200 access points in your environment.
-
Verify multicast encryption status on the Wireless LAN ControllerAccess your WLC management interface and navigate to the multicast configuration settings. Look for options related to multicast encryption, such as 'Multicast Encryption' or 'Encrypted Multicast'. Check if this feature is enabled or disabled.Affected if Multicast encryption is disabled on the WLC and these AP models are connected to it.
-
Check AP-level multicast encryption configurationConnect to the AP console or management interface and examine the wireless security settings. Look for multicast encryption parameters in the radio configuration or security policies.Affected if Multicast encryption is not enabled at the AP level for these specific models.
-
Capture and analyze wireless multicast trafficUse a wireless packet capture tool on the same RF channel as your APs. Filter for multicast frames (destination MAC addresses starting with 01-00-5E or similar) and examine the payload. Verify whether the multicast traffic contents are readable (cleartext) or appear encrypted.Affected if Multicast frames are transmitted in cleartext and contain readable WLC MAC addresses, IP addresses, or AP configuration data.
Your environment is affected if you operate Cisco Aironet AP1100 or AP1200 devices with multicast encryption disabled, as evidenced by cleartext multicast frames in wireless captures.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnable multicast encryption or upgrade to a firmware version that encrypts multicast traffic. Alternatively, implement network segmentation to isolate multicast traffic and limit exposure of controller information.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-2976 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-2976 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data