CVE-2009-3022
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bingo!CMS 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify configuration or change content via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in bingo!CMS 1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators or authenticated users for requests that modify system configuration or change content. The attack exploits the lack of anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing forms.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify bingo!CMS installation and versionCheck your web application documentation or look for identifying files (such as readme, version files, or admin login pages) that confirm bingo!CMS is installed and note the version numberAffected if The installed version is bingo!CMS 1.2 or any earlier version (1.0, 1.1, etc.)
-
Locate state-changing administrative formsIdentify forms in the admin panel that perform state-changing actions such as: system configuration changes, content creation/editing/deletion, user management, or plugin/settings modificationsAffected if State-changing forms exist in the bingo!CMS admin interface without visible anti-CSRF token fields (typically hidden input fields with randomized token values)
-
Inspect form HTML for anti-CSRF token presenceView the HTML source of administrative forms and look for hidden input fields containing random token values, or check if forms submit to endpoints that validate anti-CSRF tokensAffected if The forms do not contain anti-CSRF token fields (such as 'token', 'csrf_token', or similar) in their HTML markup
-
Verify token validation on form submissionSubmit a test form without a valid anti-CSRF token (or with a manipulated/referer-less request) and observe if the action is still processedAffected if The form submission succeeds and the state-changing action is executed even when the anti-CSRF token is missing, invalid, or when the Origin/Referer headers are absent or manipulated
You are affected if bingo!CMS version 1.2 or earlier is installed and administrative state-changing forms lack anti-CSRF token validation, allowing unauthorized configuration changes or content modifications via forged requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all forms and state-changing endpoints, and validate the Origin or Referer header on POST requests.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-3022 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-3022 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data