CVE-2009-3075
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the JavaScript engine in Mozilla Firefox before 3.0.14 and 3.5.x before 3.5.2, Thunderbird before 2.0.0.24, and SeaMonkey before 1.1.19 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors related to use of mutable strings in the js_StringReplaceHelper function in js/src/jsstr.cpp, and unknown vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a critical memory corruption vulnerability in Mozilla's JavaScript engine (js_StringReplaceHelper function in jsstr.cpp) where improper handling of mutable strings allows remote attackers to crash the browser or potentially execute arbitrary code via malicious JavaScript in web pages or emails.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.0.13= 0.1= 0.2= 0.3= 0.4= 0.5= 0.6= 0.6.1= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.8= 0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Firefox versionNavigate to Help > About Mozilla Firefox, or enter 'about:support' in the address bar, or run 'firefox -version' from command lineAffected if Version is 3.0.13 or lower, or falls within versions 0.1 through 0.9 (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.6.1, 0.7, 0.7.1, 0.8, 0.9)
-
Check for Thunderbird versionNavigate to Help > About Thunderbird, or run 'thunderbird -version' from command lineAffected if Version is 2.0.0.23 or lower (vulnerable if older than 2.0.0.24)
-
Check for SeaMonkey versionNavigate to Help > About SeaMonkey, or run 'seamonkey -version' from command lineAffected if Version is 1.1.18 or lower (vulnerable if older than 1.1.19)
-
Verify JavaScript is enabled in FirefoxGo to Tools > Options > Content (or enter 'about:config' and search for 'javascript.enabled'), confirm the setting is trueAffected if JavaScript is enabled (the exploit requires JavaScript to be active to trigger the vulnerability)
If the installed Firefox version is 3.0.13 or lower (or in the 0.x range), or Thunderbird/SeaMonkey are below their patched versions, and JavaScript is enabled in the application, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2009-3075.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade affected products to patched versions: Firefox 3.0.14/3.5.2+, Thunderbird 2.0.0.24+, or SeaMonkey 1.1.19+. For legacy systems that cannot upgrade, consider disabling JavaScript in mail clients and restricting browser access to untrusted content.
Firefox 3.0.14 (minimum fix) or Firefox 3.5.2 (minimum fix for 3.5.x branch); recommended: latest stable Firefox
- 1. Back up any important data and bookmarks from the current Firefox installation
- 2. Download the latest stable Firefox release from the official Mozilla website (https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/)
- 3. Uninstall the current Firefox version (3.0.13 or earlier, or 3.5.x)
- 4. Install the latest Firefox version
- 5. Restore bookmarks and preferences from the backup
- 6. Verify the installation by checking Help > About Firefox to confirm the version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-3075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.debian.org
- www.mozilla.org
- www.novell.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-3075 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data