CVE-2009-3607
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger overflow in the create_surface_from_thumbnail_data function in glib/poppler-page.cc in Poppler 0.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF document that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow in Poppler's create_surface_from_thumbnail_data function allows heap-based buffer overflow when processing a crafted PDF with malicious thumbnail data, potentially leading to memory corruption and arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.1= 0.1.1= 0.1.2= 0.2.0= 0.3.0= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.4.0= 0.4.1= 0.4.2= 0.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Poppler versionRun `pkg-config --modversion poppler` or `poppler-config --version`, or query your package manager (dpkg -l | grep poppler, rpm -qa | grep poppler)Affected if the reported version is between 0.1 and 0.4.3 inclusive
-
Locate Poppler library filesSearch for libpoppler shared library with `ldconfig -p | grep poppler` or `find /usr -name 'libpoppler*' 2>/dev/null`Affected if libpoppler.so exists and links to an affected version
-
Check for PDF tools using PopplerIdentify Poppler-dependent tools such as pdfinfo, pdftotext, pdfimages, or any custom application that renders or processes PDFs: run `ldd $(which pdfinfo) 2>/dev/null | grep poppler`Affected if Poppler-linked PDF processing tools are installed on the system
-
Verify thumbnail processing exposureThe vulnerability triggers when processing PDF files containing embedded thumbnail images. Determine if your PDF tools or applications process thumbnails by default or accept untrusted PDF input.Affected if the environment processes PDF documents (particularly those from untrusted sources) using Poppler-based tools
You are affected if Poppler version 0.1 through 0.4.3 is installed and your system processes PDF files using Poppler-based tools.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Poppler; avoid opening untrusted PDF documents until the library is updated.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-3607 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- www.vupen.com
- cgit.freedesktop.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- sunsolve.sun.com
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-3607 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data