Tivoli Storage ManagerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2009-3855

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2009-11-04
Patch available
A vendor patch is available. No clean upgrade release — apply the published patch.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the (1) UNIX and (2) Linux backup-archive clients, and the (3) OS/400 API client, in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) 5.3 before 5.3.6.6, 5.4 before 5.4.2, and 5.5 before 5.5.1, when the MAILPROG option is enabled, allow attackers to read, modify, or delete arbitrary files via unknown vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tivoli Storage ManagerApplication
Affected:= 5.2.5.3= 5.3= 5.3.0= 5.3.1= 5.3.2= 5.3.2.4= 5.3.3= 5.3.4= 5.3.5.1= 5.3.6.1= 5.3.6.2= 5.3.6.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Patch available Apply the vendor patch
Vendor patch www-01.ibm.com →
Recommended fix High confidence

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager client 5.3.6.6 (or 5.4.2+/5.5.1+)

  1. 1. Identify the current TSM client version by running 'dsmc -v' or checking the installed package version
  2. 2. Download the fixed version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager client from IBM Fix Central or the IBM support portal
  3. 3. For affected versions 5.2.5.3 and 5.3.x, upgrade to TSM client version 5.3.6.6 or later (alternatively 5.4.2+ or 5.5.1+)
  4. 4. Stop any running TSM scheduler or backup services before upgrading
  5. 5. Install the new client version using the appropriate package manager or installer for your operating system
  6. 6. Verify the new version is installed by running 'dsmc -v'
  7. 7. After upgrade, confirm the MAILPROG configuration is properly secured if still needed
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration or behavioral changes between versions; test backup/restore operations in a non-production environment before deploying widely

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can apply and verify the patch for your build — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the patch applied

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-3855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-3855 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data