CVE-2009-4324
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse-after-free vulnerability in the Doc.media.newPlayer method in Multimedia.api in Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.x before 9.3, and 8.x before 8.2 on Windows and Mac OS X, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file using ZLib compressed streams, as exploited in the wild in December 2009.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability in the Doc.media.newPlayer method within Multimedia.api allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PDF file containing ZLib compressed streams. The vulnerability affects Adobe Reader and Acrobat versions 9.x before 9.3 and 8.x before 8.2 on Windows and Mac OS X.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0, < 8.2>= 9.0, < 9.3>= 8.0, < 8.2>= 9.0, < 9.3= 11= 11.1= 11.2= 10.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Adobe Reader versionOn Windows, open Adobe Reader, go to Help > About Adobe Reader. On Linux, run: rpm -q adbeacrobatreader or dpkg -l | grep acroreadAffected if Version is 8.0 through 8.1.x, or 9.0 through 9.2.x (falls within >= 8.0, < 8.2 or >= 9.0, < 9.3)
-
Check installed Adobe Acrobat versionOn Windows, open Adobe Acrobat, go to Help > About Adobe Acrobat. On Linux, run: rpm -q adobeacrobat or check the installation directory for the version fileAffected if Version is 8.0 through 8.1.x, or 9.0 through 9.2.x (falls within >= 8.0, < 8.2 or >= 9.0, < 9.3)
-
Locate the Multimedia.api plugin fileOn Windows, search for Multimedia.api in the Adobe Reader/Acrobat plugins folder (typically C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader\Version\plug_ins\). On Linux, search with: find /usr -name 'Multimedia.api' 2>/dev/nullAffected if Multimedia.api file exists in the plugins directory (vulnerable component is present)
-
Check if multimedia plugin is enabledOn Windows, open Adobe Reader, go to Edit > Preferences > Security (or Trust Manager) and check Plugin settings. On Linux, check the plugins.cache file or examine the installation manifestAffected if Multimedia.api is loaded or enabled (the vulnerability requires this plugin to be active)
-
Verify Suse Linux package versions (if applicable)On Suse systems, run: rpm -qa | grep -i acroread or rpm -qa | grep -i adobe for installed packages, then check exact versions against affected Suse versions (11, 11.1, 11.2, 10.0)Affected if Package version matches Suse 11, 11.1, 11.2, or 10.0 with unpatched Adobe packages installed
You are affected if Adobe Reader or Acrobat version is 8.0-8.1.x or 9.0-9.2.x AND the Multimedia.api plugin exists and is enabled on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.29.3
Update Adobe Reader and Acrobat to version 9.3 or later (or 8.2+ for the 8.x branch) to remediate this vulnerability. Deploy the update through enterprise patch management or manual installation.
Adobe Acrobat/Reader 8.2 or later, or 9.3 or later (latest releases recommended)
- Upgrade Adobe Acrobat from any version >= 8.0 and < 8.2 to version 8.2 or later (preferably latest 8.x release)
- Upgrade Adobe Acrobat from any version >= 9.0 and < 9.3 to version 9.3 or later (preferably latest 9.x release)
- Upgrade Adobe Reader from any version >= 8.0 and < 8.2 to version 8.2 or later
- Upgrade Adobe Reader from any version >= 9.0 and < 9.3 to version 9.3 or later
- For Linux Enterprise and Opensuse systems, apply vendor-supplied security updates via the system's package manager (e.g., zypper update or yum update)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2009-4324 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- contagiodump.blogspot.com
- blogs.adobe.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.adobe.com
- www.vupen.com
- contagiodump.blogspot.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.us-cert.gov
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- osvdb.org
- www.adobe.com
- www.metasploit.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.shadowserver.org
- www.symantec.com
- www.vupen.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2009-4324 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data