Secure BackupApplication · Oracle

CVE-2010-0072

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-01-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Backup component in Oracle Secure Backup 10.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2010 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is a buffer overflow in observiced.exe that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to a "reverse lookup of connections" to TCP port 10000.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in the observiced.exe component of Oracle Secure Backup 10.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via reverse lookup connections to TCP port 10000. The vulnerability affects confidentiality, integrity, and availability with high severity due to remote code execution capability.

MitigationApply Oracle Critical Patch Update for January 2010 or later. If patching is not immediately possible, block untrusted network access to TCP port 10000 and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Secure BackupApplication
Affected:= 10.2.0.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Oracle Secure Backup installation
    Locate Oracle Secure Backup installation directory and check for observiced.exe component, or query installed programs for Oracle Secure Backup
    Affected if Oracle Secure Backup with observiced.exe component is not present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Check version information of Oracle Secure Backup installation (typically via installer properties, registry, or executable version info)
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.2.0.3 (only this specific version is affected)
  3. Verify observiced.exe is running
    Check if observiced.exe process is running on the system using Task Manager or command-line tools such as tasklist or WMIC
    Affected if observiced.exe is running and listening on TCP port 10000
  4. Confirm TCP port 10000 is exposed
    Use netstat, nmap, or similar network utility to check if port 10000 is open and listening on network interfaces
    Affected if Port 10000 is accessible from network and bound to observiced.exe
  5. Check if reverse lookup feature is enabled
    Review Oracle Secure Backup configuration for reverse lookup connection settings on the observiced.exe component (consult product documentation for configuration file location)
    Affected if Reverse lookup connections are enabled on the service listening on port 10000

Your environment is affected only if Oracle Secure Backup version 10.2.0.3 is installed with observiced.exe running and accessible on TCP port 10000 with reverse lookup enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Oracle Critical Patch Update for January 2010 or later. If patching is not immediately possible, block untrusted network access to TCP port 10000 and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Fix this in Secure Backup Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0072 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0072 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data