CVE-2010-0176
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla Firefox before 3.0.19, 3.5.x before 3.5.9, and 3.6.x before 3.6.2; Thunderbird before 3.0.4; and SeaMonkey before 2.0.4 do not properly manage reference counts for option elements in a XUL tree optgroup, which might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors that trigger access to deleted elements, related to a "dangling pointer vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMozilla products (Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey) have a dangling pointer vulnerability in XUL tree optgroup handling where improper reference counting for option elements leads to use-after-free conditions. When option elements are deleted, references are not properly managed, allowing attackers to access freed memory and potentially execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.6<= 3.5.7= 0.1= 0.2= 0.3= 0.4= 0.5= 0.6= 0.6.1= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.8<= 3.0.3= 0.1= 0.2= 0.3= 0.4= 0.5= 0.6= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.7.2= 0.7.3= 0.8<= 2.0.3= 1.0= 1.0.1= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4= 1.0.5= 1.0.6= 1.0.7= 1.0.8= 1.0.9= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Mozilla productRun 'firefox --version', 'thunderbird --version', or 'seamonkey --version' from the command line, or check Help > About in the applicationAffected if Any of Firefox, Thunderbird, or SeaMonkey is installed
-
Determine the exact version numberCompare the version output against the affected ranges: Firefox = 3.6, <= 3.5.7, or 0.1-0.8; Thunderbird <= 3.0.3 or 0.1-0.8; SeaMonkey <= 2.0.3 or 1.0-1.1Affected if The installed version matches any of the listed affected versions for that product
-
Check for XUL tree optgroup usage in applications or extensionsSearch application source code, add-ons, or deployed XUL documents for <tree> elements containing <optgroup> child elements within <treecols> structuresAffected if The environment uses XUL trees with optgroup elements that could trigger the reference counting issue when option elements are dynamically modified or deleted
The environment is affected if a vulnerable version of Firefox, Thunderbird, or SeaMonkey is installed AND the application uses XUL tree components with optgroup handling where option elements may be dynamically created, modified, or deleted.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Firefox 3.0.19/3.5.9/3.6.2 or later, Thunderbird 3.0.4 or later, or SeaMonkey 2.0.4 or later to patch the reference counting vulnerability.
Firefox 3.6.2+ / 3.5.9+ / 3.0.19+, Thunderbird 3.0.4+, SeaMonkey 2.0.4+ (or latest available releases of each product)
- 1. Identify which Mozilla product (Firefox, Thunderbird, or SeaMonkey) is installed and note the current version number.
- 2. For Firefox users: Upgrade to Firefox 3.6.2 or later (or the latest available 3.x release).
- 3. For Firefox 3.5.x users: Upgrade to Firefox 3.5.9 or later.
- 4. For Firefox 3.0.x users: Upgrade to Firefox 3.0.19 or later.
- 5. For Thunderbird users: Upgrade to Thunderbird 3.0.4 or later.
- 6. For SeaMonkey users: Upgrade to SeaMonkey 2.0.4 or later.
- 7. After upgrading, verify the new version by checking Help > About in the application menu.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0176 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- securitytracker.com
- securitytracker.com
- ubuntu.com
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.mozilla.org
- www.redhat.com
- www.redhat.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- www.vupen.com
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- oval.cisecurity.org
- oval.cisecurity.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0176 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data