CVE-2010-0206
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedxpdf allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and crash) in the way it processes JBIG2 PDF stream objects.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceXPDF contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability when processing JBIG2 stream objects within PDF files. When the JBIG2 parser encounters a specific malformed stream, it attempts to dereference a NULL pointer, causing the application to crash. Attackers can exploit this by crafting a malicious PDF containing specially constructed JBIG2 data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.03-17= 3.04-4= 3.04-13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify XPDF installation and versionRun 'xpdf -v' or check your package manager/uninstall information for xpdf or poppler-utils. On Windows, right-click the xpdf.exe and view Properties > Details for version info.Affected if The installed version matches 3.03-17, 3.04-4, or 3.04-13 exactly.
-
Confirm JBIG2 stream processing is possibleExamine PDF files you process using a tool like 'pdfinfo' or 'pdfid' to check if JBIG2Decode filters are present in your PDF documents.Affected if Your PDFs contain JBIG2 encoded streams and you process them with a vulnerable XPDF version.
-
Verify the specific code path is reachableAttempt to open a known PDF with JBIG2 content using xpdf or pdftotext from the command line: 'pdftotext yourfile.pdf -'Affected if The application successfully processes JBIG2 streams without error, indicating the vulnerable code path is reachable.
You are affected if you are running XPDF version 3.03-17, 3.04-4, or 3.04-13 AND process PDF files containing JBIG2 stream data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate XPDF to the latest version or switch to a maintained fork like Poppler that has incorporated the fix. Organizations using PDF libraries derived from XPDF should ensure they pull the latest upstream patches.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0206 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0206 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data