CVE-2010-0476
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SMB client in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, and Windows Server 2008 Gold and SP2 allows remote SMB servers and man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and reboot) via a crafted SMB transaction response that uses (1) SMBv1 or (2) SMBv2, aka "SMB Client Response Parsing Vulnerability."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SMB client in Windows Server 2003 SP2, Vista (Gold/SP1/SP2), and Windows Server 2008 (Gold/SP2) contains a memory corruption vulnerability in SMB transaction response parsing. Remote attackers can send crafted SMBv1 or SMBv2 responses to trigger heap or stack corruption, enabling arbitrary code execution or causing system reboot (denial of service).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' or check system properties to determine the exact Windows version and Service Pack levelAffected if The system is Windows Vista (any SP), Windows Server 2003 (any SP), Windows Server 2008 (any SP), or Windows 7 (any version)
-
Verify SMB client is enabledCheck if the 'Workstation' service (which provides SMB client functionality) is running: run 'sc query workstation' or check Services.msc for 'Workstation' service statusAffected if The SMB client service (Workstation) is running or set to Auto-start, making the system vulnerable when connecting to malicious SMB servers
-
Check for security update MS10-020Run 'wmic qfe list' or check 'View installed updates' in Control Panel for security update KB980232 (the patch for this CVE)Affected if Security update MS10-020 (KB980232) is NOT installed, meaning the vulnerability is unpatched
-
Assess network exposure to SMBVerify if the system can receive inbound SMB connections from untrusted networks: check firewall rules on ports 139 and 445, or run 'netstat -an | findstr :445' to see listening portsAffected if The system has open SMB ports (139/445) exposed to untrusted networks, increasing risk of remote attack
A system is affected if it runs an unpatched Windows Vista, Server 2003, Server 2008, or Windows 7 version with SMB client enabled, especially if SMB ports are exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security updates (MS10-020) to affected Windows systems. At the network layer, filter SMB traffic (ports 139/445) at perimeter firewalls and use IPsec or VPN tunnels for legitimate SMB communications to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
For systems still running Windows Server 2003 or Windows Vista (which are end-of-life), migrate to a supported Windows version such as Windows Server 2019 or Windows 10/11.
- Apply Microsoft Security Update MS10-020, which addresses CVE-2010-0476. Download and install the appropriate update for your Windows version: KB980232 for Windows Server 2003, Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008, and Windows 7.
- For Windows Server 2003 SP2: Install Security Update KB980232 from Microsoft Update or the Microsoft Download Center.
- For Windows Vista (Gold, SP1, SP2): Install Security Update KB980232.
- For Windows Server 2008 (Gold, SP2): Install Security Update KB980232.
- For Windows 7 (all versions): Install Security Update KB980232.
- After applying the update, restart the affected systems to ensure the patch takes effect.
- Verify the update was successfully installed by checking Windows Update history or using the 'wmic qfe list' command.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0476 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0476 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data