CVE-2010-0496
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFreeBit ServersMan 3.1.5 on Apple iPhone OS 3.1.2, and iPhone OS for iPod touch, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a HEAD request for the / URI.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFreeBit ServersMan 3.1.5 daemon on Apple iPhone OS 3.1.2 and iPod touch contains a vulnerability where processing a HEAD request to the root URI (/) causes the daemon to crash, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify iOS version is 3.1.2Go to Settings > General > About > Version on the iPhone or iPod touch deviceAffected if The version shows 3.1.2 exactly
-
Confirm ServersMan application is installedLook for the ServersMan app icon on the home screen of the iPhone or iPod touchAffected if The ServersMan app is present on the device
-
Identify ServersMan versionOpen ServersMan app and navigate to the version information section within the application settings or about menuAffected if The version displayed is 3.1.5 exactly
-
Verify the ServersMan HTTP daemon is runningCheck if the ServersMan service is actively listening on its HTTP port (typically port 80 or a configured port) by attempting to access the device via browser or using network inspection toolsAffected if The ServersMan HTTP daemon is running and accessible on the network
The environment is affected only if the device runs iPhone OS 3.1.2, has ServersMan version 3.1.5 installed, and the ServersMan HTTP daemon is actively running and accepting requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThis vulnerability affects obsolete iPhone OS 3.1.2 (2009-2010) and the ServersMan 3.1.5 application, which are end-of-life. Primary mitigation is to upgrade to a supported iOS version and current ServersMan release, or retire the affected devices if upgrade is not possible.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0496 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0496 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data