Mac Os X ServerOperating system · Apple

CVE-2010-0510

HIGH · 9.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-03-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.6.2 or later.
See remediation →
96/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Password Server in Apple Mac OS X Server before 10.6.3 does not properly perform password replication, which might allow remote authenticated users to obtain login access via an expired password.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mac Os X ServerOperating system
Affected:<= 10.6.2= 10.5= 10.5.0= 10.5.1= 10.5.2= 10.5.3= 10.5.4= 10.5.5= 10.5.6= 10.5.7= 10.5.8= 10.6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.6.2
Vendor patch lists.apple.com →
Recommended fix High confidence

Mac OS X Server 10.6.3 or later (for 10.6.x users); Mac OS X Server 10.6.x series for 10.5.x users

  1. 1. Backup all critical data and configuration files on the server before performing any system upgrade.
  2. 2. Verify current Mac OS X Server version by checking System Preferences > About or running 'sw_vers' in Terminal.
  3. 3. For Mac OS X Server 10.6.x: Upgrade to Mac OS X Server 10.6.3 or later to address the password replication vulnerability.
  4. 4. For Mac OS X Server 10.5.x: Note that 10.5.x is listed as affected but no explicit 10.5.x patch was provided in the referenced security advisory; consider upgrading to a supported version (10.6.3 or later).
  5. 5. After upgrading, verify the Password Server configuration is functioning correctly.
  6. 6. Test authentication with expired password accounts to confirm the vulnerability is remediated.
  7. 7. Review Apple Security Update 2010-003 (the March 2010 security update) for additional patches that may have been released alongside the 10.6.3 update.
Caveat Upgrading from 10.5.x to 10.6.x involves significant system changes and may require migration of services and configurations; test thoroughly in a staging environment before production deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can identify the exact fixed release, upgrade, and verify it in staging — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0510 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0510 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data