CVE-2010-0567
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliance 7.0 before 7.0(8.10), 7.2 before 7.2(4.45), 8.0 before 8.0(5.1), 8.1 before 8.1(2.37), and 8.2 before 8.2(1.15); and Cisco PIX 500 Series Security Appliance; allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (active IPsec tunnel loss and prevention of new tunnels) via a malformed IKE message through an existing tunnel to UDP port 4500, aka Bug ID CSCtc47782.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDenial of service vulnerability in Cisco ASA 5500 and PIX 500 security appliances allows remote attackers to send malformed IKE messages through existing IPsec tunnels to UDP port 4500, causing active tunnel loss and preventing new tunnel establishment. The vulnerability exists in IKE message processing within the affected software versions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1= 7.2= 8.0= 8.1= 8.2all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the device is a Cisco ASA 5500 series or PIX 500 series security applianceAffected if Device model is Cisco ASA 5500 or PIX 500
-
Check ASA software versionRun 'show version' and locate the software version string (e.g., 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2). Compare your version against the affected list: 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2Affected if ASA version is 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, or 8.2 (any release within these branches)
-
Check PIX software versionRun 'show version' on PIX devices to obtain the software versionAffected if PIX device runs any software version (all versions affected)
-
Verify IPsec VPN NAT-T is enabledRun 'show run | include nat-t' or 'show vpn-sessiondb' to check if NAT-T (UDP port 4500) IPsec VPN is configured and activeAffected if IPsec VPN with NAT-T is enabled and tunnels exist on UDP port 4500
The environment is affected if the device is a Cisco ASA 5500 running version 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, 8.1, or 8.2, or any PIX 500 model, and IPsec VPN with NAT-T (UDP 4500) is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco ASA software to versions 7.0(8.10), 7.2(4.45), 8.0(5.1), 8.1(2.37), or 8.2(1.15) and later. For PIX devices, apply the appropriate patched version per the Cisco advisory.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0567 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0567 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data