CVE-2010-0776
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Web Container in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.0 before 6.0.2.43, 6.1 before 6.1.0.31, and 7.0 before 7.0.0.11 does not properly handle chunked transfer encoding during a call to response.sendRedirect, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a GET request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Web Container in IBM WebSphere Application Server versions 6.0, 6.1, and 7.0 fails to properly handle chunked transfer encoding when response.sendRedirect is invoked. A remote attacker can send a specially crafted GET request to trigger this condition, causing a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.0.0.1= 6.0.0.2= 6.0.0.3= 6.0.1= 6.0.1.1= 6.0.1.2= 6.0.1.3= 6.0.1.5= 6.0.1.7= 6.0.1.9= 6.0.1.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WebSphere Application Server versionRun the versionInfo command from the bin directory: versionInfo -short or check the installedPacks file in properties directoryAffected if Installed version matches 6.0 through 6.0.1.11 (any of the listed affected versions)
-
Confirm Web Container component is runningAccess the WebSphere admin console or check WebContainer PMI (Performance Monitoring Infrastructure) statistics. From admin console: Monitoring and Tuning > Performance Viewer > Current Activity > WebContainerAffected if Web Container is enabled and processing HTTP requests on the affected server version
-
Verify server is exposed to networkCheck network binding configuration in WebSphere admin console under Servers > Server Types > WebSphere application servers > [server] > Web container settings > Web container transport chainsAffected if Server has an external-facing HTTP transport chain that accepts remote requests
A server is affected if it runs any WebSphere version 6.0.x through 6.0.1.11 with the Web Container enabled and accessible to network requests that can trigger the chunked transfer encoding issue with sendRedirect.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the IBM WebSphere patches: upgrade to version 6.0.2.43 or later, 6.1.0.31 or later, or 7.0.0.11 or later. For systems that cannot be patched immediately, consider restricting external access to the Web Container or implementing upstream request filtering.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-0776 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-0776 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data