CVE-2010-1317
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in the NTLM authentication functionality in RealNetworks Helix Server and Helix Mobile Server 11.x, 12.x, and 13.x allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via invalid base64-encoded data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the NTLM authentication module of RealNetworks Helix Server and Helix Mobile Server (versions 11.x, 12.x, 13.x). The overflow occurs when processing invalid base64-encoded credentials during NTLM authentication handshake, allowing heap memory corruption that can be exploited for remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.0= 11.1= 11.1.2= 11.1.3= 12.0= 13.0= 11.0= 11.1= 12.0.0= 13.0.0= 11.0= 12.0.0= 13.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Helix Server installationCheck for the presence of Helix Server or Helix Mobile Server by examining common installation directories (e.g., C:\Program Files\Real\Helix Server or /opt/HelixServer) and looking for executable files such as rmserver.exe or helixserver. On Linux, check for process names containing 'helix' using 'ps aux | grep -i helix'.Affected if The software is not installed or no Helix Server process is running.
-
Determine installed Helix Server versionLocate the version information in the server's about page, license file, or check the binary properties of rmserver.exe (right-click > Properties > Version) on Windows. On Linux, examine the version string in the server binary or check /var/opt/realplatform/helix/server/VERSION if it exists.Affected if The installed version matches any of these affected versions: 11.0, 11.1, 11.1.2, 11.1.3, 12.0, 12.0.0, 13.0, or 13.0.0.
-
Confirm NTLM authentication is enabledExamine the Helix Server configuration file (usually rmserver.cfg or helix.cfg in the server's config directory) for authentication settings. Look for entries containing 'NTLM', 'AuthScheme', or 'Authentication' and verify whether NTLM authentication is explicitly enabled or listed as an allowed method.Affected if NTLM authentication is listed as an enabled or allowed authentication mechanism in the server configuration.
-
Verify NTLM authentication endpoint exposureCheck if the server is listening on ports that accept NTLM authentication (typically port 554 for RTSP or other media streaming ports). Use 'netstat -an | grep -E "554|7070|8080"' on Linux or check open ports on Windows to confirm the server is reachable and potentially exposing the vulnerable authentication module.Affected if The Helix Server is running and accepting connections on ports that support NTLM authentication.
You are affected if Helix Server or Helix Mobile Server versions 11.0 through 13.0.0 are installed with NTLM authentication enabled and accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the latest Helix Server version or apply vendor-provided patches; alternatively, disable NTLM authentication if not required and use stronger authentication mechanisms.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-1317 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-1317 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data