Suse LinuxOperating system · Novell

CVE-2010-1507

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2010-09-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WebYaST in yast2-webclient in SUSE Linux Enterprise (SLE) 11 on the WebYaST appliance uses a fixed secret key that is embedded in the appliance's image, which allows remote attackers to spoof session cookies by leveraging knowledge of this key.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

WebYaST on SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 uses a hardcoded secret key embedded in the appliance image for signing session cookies. Since this same key is distributed with every appliance instance, any attacker who obtains or Reverse-engineers the image can forge valid session cookies and impersonate legitimate users.

MitigationReplace the fixed embedded secret key with a dynamically generated or externally configured unique key per appliance instance, and rotate all existing session tokens to invalidate any potentially compromised sessions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Suse LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 11

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WebYaST is installed
    Check if the WebYaST package or service is present on the SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 system using package manager commands (rpm -qa | grep webyast) or service discovery methods
    Affected if WebYaST is found to be installed and running on the affected system
  2. Locate the session signing key configuration
    Search WebYaST configuration files and appliance image directories for files containing secret key, session key, or cookie signing material. Common locations include /etc/webyast, /opt/webyast, or application config directories within the appliance image
    Affected if A secret key file is found in the WebYaST configuration or appliance image
  3. Examine the key for hardcoded characteristics
    Open the located key file and examine whether the key value appears to be hardcoded (static string) rather than dynamically generated (random, environment-derived, or externally configurable)
    Affected if The signing key is a static, hardcoded string rather than a dynamically generated or externally configured unique value
  4. Compare key across multiple instances
    If access to multiple SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 WebYaST appliance images or instances is available, extract and compare the session signing keys from each
    Affected if The same key value is found across different appliance instances, confirming it is a shared hardcoded key rather than a unique per-instance secret
  5. Test session cookie forgery capability
    Using the extracted hardcoded key, attempt to craft a valid session cookie for WebYaST and verify if it is accepted by the application
    Affected if A forged session cookie signed with the extracted key is accepted by the WebYaST application, confirming the vulnerability is exploitable

The system is affected if WebYaST is running on SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 and uses a hardcoded secret key for session cookie signing that is shared across appliance instances.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace the fixed embedded secret key with a dynamically generated or externally configured unique key per appliance instance, and rotate all existing session tokens to invalidate any potentially compromised sessions.

Fix this in Suse Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2010-1507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2010-1507 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data